There is no such thing as AI. They are just souped up algorithms. Like autocorrect on steroids.
Scientists can’t even map the human brain but they are calling these algorithms AI to give them validation. It makes stupid people trust their algorithms as if it is some omnipotent god instead of a precisely programmed algorithm that returns the results that the coder wants.
Your reply isn’t respectful at all. It’s like when people say no offense then proceed to be incredibly offensive. Just because you say it doesn’t make it true.
This isn’t my idea. This idea comes from a best selling author and ceo of an AI company who has written 5 books on AI and the human mind.
You didn’t act in good faith at all and that is why your comment is completely fallacious and lacks any substance. You just say I’m wrong and then present no evidence or reasoning. It makes you seem ignorant. it’s the equivalent of a three year old saying nuh-uh to adults who know far more about the world.
There is no discussion to be had in what you said. That is the clear indicator it was made in bad faith. If you were respectfully disagreeing with me you would have presented a reasonable argument that I could consider.
Instead you said literally nothing of substance, again like a 3 year old shouting nuh-uh you’re dumb and wrong. At least that’s how it looks to those of us who can think.
There is no such thing as AI. They are just souped up algorithms. Like autocorrect on steroids.
Scientists can’t even map the human brain but they are calling these algorithms AI to give them validation. It makes stupid people trust their algorithms as if it is some omnipotent god instead of a precisely programmed algorithm that returns the results that the coder wants.
The most powerful ones are only precise after 1000 pajeets finetuning. If I'm not mistaken.
consciousness is not located in the brain. the brain is just an antenna. a computer algorithm cannot duplicate this.
Respectfully sir, this sounds like a take from a retard. Someone who thinks they're far smarter than they actually are. Again, with all due respect.
Your reply isn’t respectful at all. It’s like when people say no offense then proceed to be incredibly offensive. Just because you say it doesn’t make it true.
This isn’t my idea. This idea comes from a best selling author and ceo of an AI company who has written 5 books on AI and the human mind.
https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/what-if-generative-ai-turned-out?trk=article-ssr-frontend-pulse_little-text-block
You didn’t act in good faith at all and that is why your comment is completely fallacious and lacks any substance. You just say I’m wrong and then present no evidence or reasoning. It makes you seem ignorant. it’s the equivalent of a three year old saying nuh-uh to adults who know far more about the world.
There is no discussion to be had in what you said. That is the clear indicator it was made in bad faith. If you were respectfully disagreeing with me you would have presented a reasonable argument that I could consider.
Instead you said literally nothing of substance, again like a 3 year old shouting nuh-uh you’re dumb and wrong. At least that’s how it looks to those of us who can think.
https://thenextweb.com/news/meta-yann-lecun-ai-behind-human-intelligence What’s this? The godfather of AI.
This is how you slay a shill, facts, evidence, and reasoning. Something your posts lack.
TL;DR