All truly dogmatic religions have issued from the Kabalah and return to it
Everything scientific and grand in the religious dreams of all the illuminati...is borrowed from the Kabalah; all the Masonic associations owe to it their Secrets and their Symbols
The Kabalah alone consecrates the alliance of the Universal Reason and the Divine Word; it establishes, by the counterpoises of two forces apparently opposite, the eternal balance of being; it alone reconciles Reason with Faith, Power with Liberty, Science with Mystery...
The Bible, with all the allegories it contains, expresses, in an incomplete and veiled manner only, the religious science of the Hebrews.
The Hebrew books were written only to recall to memory the traditions; and they were written in Symbols unintelligible to the Profane.
The Pentateuch and the prophetic poems were merely elementary books of doctrine, morals, or liturgy; and the true secret and traditional philosophy was only written afterward, under veils still less transparent.
Thus was a second Bible born, unknown to, or rather uncomprehended by, the Christians; a collection, they say, of monstrous absurdities; a monument, the adept says, wherein is everything that the genius of philosophy and that of religion have ever formed or imagined of the sublime; a treasure surrounded by thorns; a diamond concealed in a rough dark stone.
the consecration of the most fundamental realities by the primitive characters; the Trinity of Words, Letters, and Numbers; a philosophy simple as the alphabet, profound and infinite as the Word; theorems more complete and luminous than those of Pythagoras; a theology summed up by counting on one's fingers; an Infinite which can be held in the hollow of an infant's hand; ten ciphers, and twenty-two letters, a triangle, a square, and a circle,—these are all the elements of the Kabalah. These are the elementary principles of the written Word, reflection of that spoken Word that created the world!
"In this intro to our new series on the ABCs of Kabbalah, we introduce the concept of Ein Soph, the non-being that grounds the theosophical system of modernity."
ABC (Latin abecedary) implies suggested ABraCaDabra...Kabbalah (Hebrew qibbel; to receive, admit, accept) implies ones consent to suggested (word), while ignoring perceivable (sound).
non-being
Aka being (perception) denying (Latin nihilo; nothing) everything (perceivable) for the suggestions by another.
ein soph
a) FAL'LACY, noun (Latin fallacia) - "that (suggestion) which misleads the eye (perception).
b) Ones consent to suggested soph-ism shapes one into a soph-ist.
c) SOPH (wise; to know) implies to perceive (as partial) perceivable (whole)...consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore that.
d) THEO (suggested the-ism) contradicts SOPH (to perceive)...if one chooses to ignore latter for former.
to introduce a concept
INTRO (within) DUCO (to lead) implies being (life) within lead (inception towards death).
CON (together; with) CAPERE (to take) implies taking from another while joining together.
Any suggested concept tempts one to ignore being led within perceivable, and ones consent implies holding onto conceptual (suggested information) while ignoring natural (perceivable inspiration).
Inspiration cannot be held onto; only adapted to, while letting it pass through one; hence IN (being within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breath) ATION (action)...breathing while being enacted upon implies being reaction within.
~Albert Pike - Morals & Dogma"
"In this intro to our new series on the ABCs of Kabbalah, we introduce the concept of Ein Soph, the non-being that grounds the theosophical system of modernity."
ABC (Latin abecedary) implies suggested ABraCaDabra...Kabbalah (Hebrew qibbel; to receive, admit, accept) implies ones consent to suggested (word), while ignoring perceivable (sound).
Aka being (perception) denying (Latin nihilo; nothing) everything (perceivable) for the suggestions by another.
a) FAL'LACY, noun (Latin fallacia) - "that (suggestion) which misleads the eye (perception).
b) Ones consent to suggested soph-ism shapes one into a soph-ist.
c) SOPH (wise; to know) implies to perceive (as partial) perceivable (whole)...consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore that.
d) THEO (suggested the-ism) contradicts SOPH (to perceive)...if one chooses to ignore latter for former.
Any suggested concept tempts one to ignore being led within perceivable, and ones consent implies holding onto conceptual (suggested information) while ignoring natural (perceivable inspiration).
Inspiration cannot be held onto; only adapted to, while letting it pass through one; hence IN (being within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breath) ATION (action)...breathing while being enacted upon implies being reaction within.