Alex Jones, Candace Owens and Russell Brand are all very articulate and good at debate and discussion and delivery of content. So if you were the opposition you would definitely want to hire people like this. So the question is how much of the content and coverage that Alex Jones, Candace Owens, and Russell Brand are their own journalism and content versus what they are paid to or merely profit from reporting (grifting).

I'm not convinced Alex Jones is merely a grifter because he seems too passionate and hard working to merely be some spokesman for some message/content he's paid to sell. Plus he tries too hard to sell overpriced vitamins if he's getting CIA money in the background. It could be that he's one of us but he just gets it wrong sometimes or gets sucked back into political party partisanship because he's not infallible. But I could be wrong.

Candace Owens seems like a black Megyn Kelly to me but more grassroots and organic. I consider her a rare articulate black woman with a doe face like Megyn Kelly who wasn't saying anything revolutionary or pioneering a new political idea except that it was so rare to hear an articulate and attractive black female speak so supportingly of Christian Conservative politics while every other black woman (over 90% of black female voters) were ingrained and loyal to the democrat plantation. As the Obama campaign mocked Republicans of being the party of "old white men" the GOP and conservative pundits sought out articulate attractive black correspondents to market their political message and ideas. This opens up the possibility that Candace Owens is moreso a spokesperson, however it seems she also got famous for trending on social media (back when you were still allowed to). I like her because she's never said anything that angered me or seemed like a mischievous lie, even if the conspiracies community might consider her commentary as normie politics.

I've never liked Russell Brand. He used to be a leftist and he always seemed to want attention and be a little gay or bi. If any of these three were just hired grifters paid to read scripts or produce shows/content for some behind the curtain operative then he'd be most suspect in my opinion.

Alex Jones and Russell Brand seem to have been on the receiving end of some lawfare and extortion attempts (sexual assault allegations and such) and that may also compromise them if they went into this profession with altruistic intentions to speak truth to power.

TLDR I don't know for sure. Just sharing perspective of what I know about these three pundits without knowing enough to write a biography about any of them.

Ultracrepidarian

I think it is good that the things you and I were discussing two or three years ago eventually make it mainstream.

That means you and I are ahead of the game and our influence, a bunch of anonymous people on the internet, eventually dictates what mainstream show hosts have to report or bend to.

Or maybe it is a lesson that truth prevails?

You and I have power. Our discussion, sharing of news articles and evidence, analysis of current and past events, predictions, discussions over morality and good versus evil (and first class memes) has influence and spreads. There's people who follow trends and people who make trends. You and I make trends. At first we are mocked and criticized and condemned and censored and pushed into the fringe areas of the internet or world (4chan and conspiracies forums), but we are unbending and uncompromising and persistent and eventually, when we show we can say these things and report these things and speak the truth and we are still alive and doing well and prospering, then others who FOLLOW trends get the courage to speak out the truth finally. Fear keeps them believing in the safe lies. We give them courage to believe in the truth.

Use the mask scamdemic as an example. Everyone was scared to go into public WITHOUT a mask because they were BULLIED to put one on. But when people saw me in a grocery store without a mask ready to punch the first Karen who said something and stuff her mask up her wrinkled dried up vagina, then they felt the courage to take their masks off too.

u/#Clownworld

Notable Context and Timeline:

Adam Green interviewed Owen Shroyer on KnowMoreKnews and civilly challenged Owen on Infowars' lack of reporting on jew involvement in globalism. But he was fair and instead of arguing he just pulled up lots of evidence for Owen, found common ground (beards), and suggested Owen Shroyer watch a documentary Adam made on Jewish Rabbis speaking about Edom. So perhaps Owen Shroyer took some of this content back to Infowars or Infowars was just late to the party.

OWEN SHROYER RETURNS TO THE LIONS' DEN | KNOW MORE NEWS W/ ADAM GREEN, MAR 21, 2024 https://www.bitchute.com/video/STEsJsbfP6Xv/

I do suspect that Infowars has some jewish financial backers / sponsors so it is a delicate topic for Alex Jones to come out against all Jews or be portrayed as Anti-Semitic. It also seems like Infowars is always involved in lawsuits/lawfare and probably always has a case pending before a jewish judge. So i think Alex Jones and Infowars are probably compromised in this manner as well as others.

That's nonsense