REVOLT!
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
You focus a lot on death
a) Being alive implies FO'CUS, noun - "a fire, hearth"...focusing burns one out.
b) LOT, noun - "that which, in human speech, is called chance; hazard, fortune; fate; the determination of Providence" aka the effect of an unknown cause.
Being implies as effect (life) within known cause (inception towards death). Few are "casting a lot" to aggregate many, which nature scatters apart.
c) As matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion, one needs to balance as choice, hence resisting to incline to either suggested side, as to remain at center of perceivable.
d) Being alive implies withIN process of dying...other suggest ON death to tempt life onwards towards death. It's being called progressivism.
One needs to resist wanted progression...not follow along suggested progressivism.
Gibberish
What if I write about natural (perceivable sound), while you choose to ignore it for artificial (suggested words), hence making it inarticulate for your view?
What if perceived as self implies natural; while suggested by another implies artificial?
Does nature articulate anything? Do those within nature have the free will of choice to articulate to each other, while ignoring nature?
You honestly contribute nothing of value to ANY discussion