REVOLT!
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
The more we retreat from the culture at large the more room we will have to carve out lives of meaning, the more we will be able to wall off the flood of illusions disseminated by mass culture and the more we will retain sanity in an insane world.
Chris Hedges
We are not here to curse the darkness, but to light the candle that can guide us thru that darkness to a safe and sane future.
John F. Kennedy
a) Ones consent to suggested culturalism shapes one mind/memory into the place of confinement, which implies a retreat into self.
b) What one ignores when consenting to suggested culturalism is that the ongoing process of dying cultivates (to advance the growth of) those living within...a growth requiring one to resist loss.
c) There is no retreat from response-ability (free will of choice)...denial/ignorance and shirking onto others implies ones free will of choice.
Perceivable inspiration implies flood/flow...suggested inFORMation implies ones consent to take on; hold onto, and thereby burden self with whatever others are suggesting.
The wall implies ones denial/ignorance of perceivable flow, when consenting to suggested form, which is why mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within ones mind/memory.
Sleight of hand... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/serjtankian/emptywalls.html
Aka sound (sanus) and being within (in) sound (sanus).
CURSE, verb - "to utter imprecations; to affirm or deny" aka ones consent (affirm or deny) to the suggested information by another, which implies ones denial/ignorance (darkness) of perceivable (light).
Furthermore...curse; cursive; current; course, hence cursing (inception towards death) self (life) when ignoring perceivable for suggested.
Bonus...cursive writing implies written with a running hand without raising the pen. The opposite of that (unical) implies each one letter apart from one another aka cursive (inception towards death) generating unical (life).
You focus a lot on death
a) Being alive implies FO'CUS, noun - "a fire, hearth"...focusing burns one out.
b) LOT, noun - "that which, in human speech, is called chance; hazard, fortune; fate; the determination of Providence" aka the effect of an unknown cause.
Being implies as effect (life) within known cause (inception towards death). Few are "casting a lot" to aggregate many, which nature scatters apart.
c) As matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion, one needs to balance as choice, hence resisting to incline to either suggested side, as to remain at center of perceivable.
d) Being alive implies withIN process of dying...other suggest ON death to tempt life onwards towards death. It's being called progressivism.
One needs to resist wanted progression...not follow along suggested progressivism.
Gibberish
What if I write about natural (perceivable sound), while you choose to ignore it for artificial (suggested words), hence making it inarticulate for your view?
What if perceived as self implies natural; while suggested by another implies artificial?
Does nature articulate anything? Do those within nature have the free will of choice to articulate to each other, while ignoring nature?
You honestly contribute nothing of value to ANY discussion
a) Value (inception towards death) generates evaluation (life)...evaluating the suggested values by another devalues oneself.
b) Nothing implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consenting de-nial of everything perceivable for it.
c) Contribute and discussion implies CON (together; with) DIS (apart, asunder, in a different direction) aka a contradiction, hence all contributing partials within any discussion finding themselves within a conflict of reason against one another.
Notice the option (up-vote or down-vote) next to each "contribution" to any "discussion"...it doesn't matter what is written, only that those reading it consent to conflicts of reason about it.
d) Honor implies versus dishonor...yet another conflict of reason, and no matter how much honor or dishonor one has; the conflict continues.
e) Notice that contribute implies TRIBUTE; noun - "stated sum of money or other valuable consideration paid by one ruler or country to another in acknowledgment of submission or as the price of peace or protection"
Next notice that free-will-of-choice doesn't con-tribute (Post Score - 0)...why?...because choice implies reaction within enacting balance.
Motion offers balance (inception/death)...matter reacts as choice (life). Ignoring this for each others suggested choices implies imbalance.
f) How about this...can nature contribute nothing of value to those within?
g) The topic here is about revolt...so how does discussing contributions revolt against anything?
If I'm the one standing out with my behavior from the norm of contributing to discussions, then what if I'm the one breaking apart from established authority aka revolting?
Do jews contribute to discussions or do jewish suggestions set the foundation for consenting gentiles to contribute their opinions within discussions?
Direction (inception towards death) generates responses (life) within itself...few suggest circular reasoning to tempt many into opposition to each other.
Yep that's the beginning of that sentence then it goes on to say "against the modern world. Not because it is modern but because it is Evil"
When I wrote it? When you wrote it? When Julius Evola wrote "Rivolta contro il mondo moderno"? When few suggested information (words) over inspiration (sound) towards many? When inception sets ones life-sentence towards death? When energy generated (motion) beginning towards end (momentum) for the matter within?
Created with Photoshop and posted on the internet.
Whatchu talking about that's a selfie I took this morning 😂😎
When you want to reject modernity but mom won't let you.