To understand the current world affairs, you need to understand the mindset of Zionism and Jewish Supremacy. This debate between Candice Owens and Rabbi Barclay highlight the concept nicely. The debate speaks for itself, but nevertheless we should highlight and share key points.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ9GQ-gexhQ
(1) Jews get to define antisemitism, not you, not anyone else. They freely admit this definition changes overtime, but they are in the sole position to define what is antisemitism and not antisemitism. This concedes debate and power to the Jew so that he has complete control over the dialogue. There is no rational or objective definition that lies outside Jewish control (e.g. a jury) but instead the Jewish community defines antisemitism.
(2) An attack on a Jew is held above all other things. There is no moral equivalent, the supposed "fact" that 1200 Jews died on OCT 7th trumps 30000 Palestinians dead, it trumps 100,000 Palestinian dead, it will even Trump 1,000,000 Palestinian children dead - one Jew life is worth the entire world of goyim. The Rabbi claims the Palestinians have gave up their humanity (dehumanizing is a step in genocide) because of the Oct 7th attack thus genocide is acceptable. This type of sociopathic behavior may be due to decades of inbreeding among Jews.
(3) Under no circumstances can you bring up the concept of Hitler or anything else the Jews don't like. The very mention of Hitler (in any context) is appalling to Jews and as such there is never a reason to mention it. The Jews control your speech (based on their definition of antisemitism) and thus they maintain power over you. Don't even think of admitting Hitler did anything right - NOTHING. There is literally nothing this man did that was right in the eyes of Jews (not even the fact that he was an animal rights proponent).
(4) Rabbi Barclay attacks "Passion of the Christ" because the devil manifest in the faces of children (who he claims were Jewish). So this is antisemitic. Now think about about many Jewish directors there exist in Hollywood and the modern villain and hero stereotype: White Villain, Black/Minority hero. Think of commercials: White Woman / Black Father, Black person in possession of knowledge / authority and White man acting stupid / foolish. What is Borat other than a Jew walking around making fun of white people? This is prevalent throughout (((Hollywood))) and a blatant obvious example of anti-whiteness; however, according to Jews there would be no moral equivalency. Jews are held to their own standards:
(5) Jews have their own standard. They are above you and above moral equivalency. Rabbi Barclay states that the definition of antisemitism is allowed to change (whereas other definitions are not) because Jews are unique. Jewish hatred, according to Barclay, is the unlike any other hatred - which, again, there is no moral equivalency when dealing with Jews. They hold themselves above all other groups.
Let me know what you found interesting in the comments below and dont forget to smash the like button and subscribe.
If a gentile chooses to stand under (understand) a jewish suggestion, then a jew was chosen to be supreme.
...implies ignoring to resist (life) current (inception towards death).
One needs to resist the wanted temptation to stand under another...otherwise one cannot sustain self.
Aka reasoning over suggested information; while ignoring the implication of perceivable inspiration.
Gentiles consenting to suggested -isms permits a jew to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
a) A jew suggests definition and time to tempt gentiles to ignore being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka constantly changing. Holding onto suggested definitions; while contemplating affixed states (past; present; future) tempts one to ignore being moved.
b) A jew suggests words to tempt gentiles to ignore perceivable sound, hence suggested "definition" tempting one to ignore perceivable "DEAF PHONETICIAN" aka being deaf to perceivable phonics (sound).
Another example: suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable....being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound).
Suggesting words (information) over sound (inspiration) implies spell-craft.
a) Sole (all perceivable) generates positions (ones perception) by separating itself from whole into partial.
b) Whole/sole/soul aka "one for all and all for one" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone - ALL(in)ONE"
c) Consenting to suggested definition implies ONES CHOICE establishing CHOSEN ONES position over self by submitting of self to another.
d) Suggested pluralism (they) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
a) Rational implies reasoning over suggested definitions. A jew suggests to tempt gentiles to reason against one another over suggested; which permits a jew control over both sides of every conflict of reason.
Nature operates on implication (if/then)...not on reason (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; agree vs disagree; believe vs denial; good vs bad etc.)
Being implies choice within balance, hence if balance; then choice...reasoning against other choices implies imbalance.
b) Objective implies as perceived by self; consenting to anything suggested by another tempts one to subject self.
c) Being (life) implies in (inception) and out (death) of sides (inception/death balance aka momentum of motion for matter within).
d) jews suggest sides to tempt gentiles off-center and into circumference, which permits jews to erect self at center, while cutting off circumference. This implies circumcision.
Being implies center (perception) within circumference (perceivable)...