The entire argument of emission driven heating assumes solar output is a fixed constant and cherry-picks pieces of data to support a link between temperature increase and C02.
Currently the CO2 level of the atmosphere is about 0.04%. If it falls to 0.02% most of the plants on the planet would quickly starve.
And, in the grand scheme of things, human contribution is negligible.
That's very possible. But to me, so is the opposite. I just don't know for sure and nobody here does either.
What I do know for sure is that the climate is definitely changing. Is it cyclical? Perhaps.
The sun drives our climate.
The entire argument of emission driven heating assumes solar output is a fixed constant and cherry-picks pieces of data to support a link between temperature increase and C02.
Currently the CO2 level of the atmosphere is about 0.04%. If it falls to 0.02% most of the plants on the planet would quickly starve.
The earth goes thru periods of warmth and cold...early 1900s had comparable temperatures. Just 3 wonters ago was one of the coldest I've experienced.
If polution needs to be addressed than start with corporations which cause over 70% of it.