Legitimate question; why does it make no sense? I've seen two different types of contrails/chemtrails laid down at the same time. Ones that evaporate like normal and other ones that linger and spread out into cloud cover on what would have been otherwise perfectly blue skies. I can recall seeing the same thing all the way back to when I was still a teenager (over 20 years ago) where beautiful days get turned into shit overcast and it's 100% contrails, not real clouds.
Aircraft are a terrible places to hide extra weight. And anything dispersed is going to weigh a lot if we assume the volume of contrails observed is purely 'chemtrails'. There simply isn't available lifting capacity to move cargo/people AND disperse an additional agent.
Look at the cloud seeding aircraft, the ones we know exist. The majority of the weight is taken up by the seeding agent. Commercial flights wouldn't work at all if they had to also carry chemtrail chemicals.
Further, why would they want the chemicals way up in the flight levels above 18000 feet? We can see the trails and they don't fall down like rain.
Wouldn't it make more sense to put the chemical somewhere closer to the ground? Say in automotive fuel where we can interact with the exhaust much more easily and were few people will notice the extra weight?
Or why wouldn't they simply add it to our food supply?
BTW I'm over 40 and commercial jet airliners have **always ** produced contrails. So enough with that bullshit.
Of course they have always produced contrails, I'm not arguing that, though I can't speak for anyone else. I just know that I've watched planes lay them out side by side with one laying down trails that spread out into cloud cover and ones that simply evaporate into nothingness. If I was seeing them on different days, different times of year, etc, I'd chalk it up to different conditions, perhaps, but when it's right next to each other, that's hard to just write off. That said, I don't think whatever it is has anything to do with ingesting whatever it may be. I think there's some other goal. I have no reason to trust government agencies, airlines or anyone else, for that matter, and history suggests it's better to bet against them than to buy into what they dish out. If something seems suspicious, it probably is.
"Right next to each other" - well they're never really 'right next to each other' and winds at different heights are often doing different things. (Which is how hot air balloons navigate)
Flight separation in the flight levels (18,000 and above)
Vertically with Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums
1,000 feet
Vertically without Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums
1,000 feet at or below FL 290
2000 feet above FL 290
Laterally:
5 miles enroute
Clouds are not chemtrails. That would be weather manipulation if anything.
All right, rabbi, I'll just ignore my lying eyes. It was all a hallucination. You know what "right next to each other means" and you're playing a retarded game of semantics. You can kindly fuck off at this point as it's pointless discussing anything with someone who isn't a good faith actor.
Legitimate question; why does it make no sense? I've seen two different types of contrails/chemtrails laid down at the same time. Ones that evaporate like normal and other ones that linger and spread out into cloud cover on what would have been otherwise perfectly blue skies. I can recall seeing the same thing all the way back to when I was still a teenager (over 20 years ago) where beautiful days get turned into shit overcast and it's 100% contrails, not real clouds.
Aircraft are a terrible places to hide extra weight. And anything dispersed is going to weigh a lot if we assume the volume of contrails observed is purely 'chemtrails'. There simply isn't available lifting capacity to move cargo/people AND disperse an additional agent.
Look at the cloud seeding aircraft, the ones we know exist. The majority of the weight is taken up by the seeding agent. Commercial flights wouldn't work at all if they had to also carry chemtrail chemicals.
Further, why would they want the chemicals way up in the flight levels above 18000 feet? We can see the trails and they don't fall down like rain.
Wouldn't it make more sense to put the chemical somewhere closer to the ground? Say in automotive fuel where we can interact with the exhaust much more easily and were few people will notice the extra weight?
Or why wouldn't they simply add it to our food supply?
BTW I'm over 40 and commercial jet airliners have **always ** produced contrails. So enough with that bullshit.
Of course they have always produced contrails, I'm not arguing that, though I can't speak for anyone else. I just know that I've watched planes lay them out side by side with one laying down trails that spread out into cloud cover and ones that simply evaporate into nothingness. If I was seeing them on different days, different times of year, etc, I'd chalk it up to different conditions, perhaps, but when it's right next to each other, that's hard to just write off. That said, I don't think whatever it is has anything to do with ingesting whatever it may be. I think there's some other goal. I have no reason to trust government agencies, airlines or anyone else, for that matter, and history suggests it's better to bet against them than to buy into what they dish out. If something seems suspicious, it probably is.
"Right next to each other" - well they're never really 'right next to each other' and winds at different heights are often doing different things. (Which is how hot air balloons navigate)
Clouds are not chemtrails. That would be weather manipulation if anything.
All right, rabbi, I'll just ignore my lying eyes. It was all a hallucination. You know what "right next to each other means" and you're playing a retarded game of semantics. You can kindly fuck off at this point as it's pointless discussing anything with someone who isn't a good faith actor.