There's not enough soldiers in the world to occupy a country with a currently estimated population of 336,289,933 Let's say only 10% would defy whatever their strategy may be that's STILL 33 million heavily armed people with an advantage of knowing the geography better then any foreigner I wouldn't put it past them to be blind to the lessons of Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan but occupation only works with enough troops to literally stand on every corner and even then the losses would be horrendous
I think you're mostly correct, but there's an active depopulation program going on in the US and Europe with the shots – and the climate seems rich with the possibility of "natural" disasters, food shortages, grid failure, nuclear exchange, etc. etc. that will further cull the (mostly white) populations. The playing field can be evened pretty quickly.
There's not enough soldiers in the world to occupy a country with a currently estimated population of 336,289,933 Let's say only 10% would defy whatever their strategy may be that's STILL 33 million heavily armed people with an advantage of knowing the geography better then any foreigner I wouldn't put it past them to be blind to the lessons of Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan but occupation only works with enough troops to literally stand on every corner and even then the losses would be horrendous
I think it's more to scare people into supporting universal background checks
I think you're mostly correct, but there's an active depopulation program going on in the US and Europe with the shots – and the climate seems rich with the possibility of "natural" disasters, food shortages, grid failure, nuclear exchange, etc. etc. that will further cull the (mostly white) populations. The playing field can be evened pretty quickly.