responses to both are just pure retardation on both poal and voat.
[ credit where credit is due: they did point out, correctly , that this is a Logan act violation if in fact Obama is not really the president ]
obviously, it will be that Kate is dead. maybe there will be some other stuff as well.
Logan act* violation-denying (?) story here: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/03/18/barack-obama-rishi-sunak-informal-talks-downing-street/
that story also ommits that Obama has also just met with Lord Cameron the former prime minister of England and the current foreign secretary. oh, whoops, they must have just forgotten
'*' I really don't know if his actions do or would violate the Logan ACT. one of the chat AIS said or described the Logan act as applying to adversary countries. and even the idea of it I just heard on someone's comment. I really don't know jack shit about it at all. butt and and it would be good for someone to investigate I don't know, I don't know anything and I do not want to find out. if there was a legal system it would be important. I don't know if there is a legal system.
get this: apparently they chatted about AI over a cup of tea. one of the worst things is that about 50% of the people that read that article will actually believe this stuff.