Try Radical Honesty! Our society has been conditioned to believe that feelings are more important than the truth and I believe this is one of the many reasons for the current state of affairs. The Powers That Be implant ideas everyday into the minds of idiots who the parrot them, the majority of these ideas are fear based but I say fuck that noise! You want to change the world start in the only place that you cannot escape, your own mind. It's been said a lie goes around the world twice before the truth has time to put it's pants on So fuck their spoon feeding of lies Live honestly with yourself and with those around you! We can change the world if we change the way people view the world and the most obvious answer to me is RADICAL HONESTY. Some will say but I don't wish to offend those close to me with what might hurt them and that's just illogical, if your bond with someone is held together with bullshit it's not worth having. The bread and butter of the people who've convinced themselves it's their job to make the world live in fear do not act honestly they probably avoid it at all costs. You can use truth as a weapon against the evil forces who've beset us all!
Comments (31)
sorted by:
One helpful hint for people. The virtue on honesty is not a reason to be a jerk to people. Politeness is the social lubrication that helps society function.
Good form, mad king. Good form.
I completely agree about politeness, I don't think most people realize how close to chaos society has become and one of the few things holding that dam back is being polite. Honesty as a tool of being malicious in my opinion is better than dishonesty in a flattering or polite manner. We are adults, people should be able to differentiate between the two but nuance is lost on most because they paint in very broad strokes, like a circuit I'd rather them fail open with Radical Honesty than fail closed with disingenuous, dishonest behavior.
I was listening to this last night Aristotle had an all or nothing view on virtue as a whole but I believe there's nuance https://youtu.be/fBeUzngRFG8?si=s6okOEbywJ-vNawv
a) Agree vs disagree...always in conflict with each other.
b) Polite/Politic...used by few to smooth the rude masses.
How does a singular (one) mature into a plural (we)? What if ignoring self for others implies immaturity?
This coming from a guy who defends his stupidity by calling people virgins. Amazing. Childish and morally superior, typical leftist shill behavior.
Did you get your feelings hurt by an Internet stranger? Best crawl back inside your mother, boy 😂🤣
Just pointing out your hypocritical childishness.
Psychological projection is a psychological phenomenon where feelings directed towards the self are displaced towards other people. It is an unconscious way of coping with emotional conflict and discomfort. Psychoanalysts regard projection as a defense mechanism of alterity concerning "inside" content mistaken to be coming from the "outside". Projection involves attributing personal feelings, desires, or qualities to another person, group, animal, or object. People use defense mechanisms like projection to protect themselves from anxiety and internal discomfort without being fully aware of what drives their behavior.
Yes, your post is about politeness, yet you lash out like a child.
You responded to my comment about politeness with a rude comment and I'm lashing out 🤣 Sounds like you're very familiar with DARVO is an acronym that stands for "deny, attack, and reverse victim & offender." It is a common manipulation strategy used by perpetrators of wrongdoing, particularly sexual offenders, in response to being held accountable for their behavior. I hope you aren't your kids primary parent
Function implies "discharge"; society implies "aggregation of persons"...the latter implies putting together; while the former implies taking apart.
Few suggest society-ism (socialism) and community-ism (communism) to tempt many together; which nature then sets apart aka dis (life) charge (inception towards death).
Lubrication of partials within whole is required to reduce friction among partials...society tempts partials into each other to generate friction.
Furthermore; solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) implies each ones unction aka anointment - "set apart; consecrated with oil" aka male (motion) through female (momentum) for setting apart transform (matter).
Garbage
Based and truthpilled.
We need truth. Truth is life. God is Truth.
Yep! I did this a few weeks ago to a (recently former) local school board member whos district had a 16-yr old girl collapse at a football game, dead from myocarditis. I just wanted to point out the likely cause of this myocarditis. Turns out, the girl is the daughter of this mans best friend. I almost got punched, it was close there for a few..BUT....fuck these chickenshits, TELL EM.
People not only adopt ideas that they see on TV, they adopt their attitudes.
The snide, combative attitude toward conspiracy theorists if often passed on to the viewer.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
So truth changes. If one applies change to truth it becomes a lie.
If self-evident is the goal, and others (ridiculed, opposed) are the obstacle, then why is truth suggested by others?
That's a non sequitur. What he meant is the perception of truth by people passing through stages, not truth itself which is absolute and unchanging.
a) Perception implies in response to what WAS perceivable...responding to what others suggest IS tempts one to ignore that.
b) Mean/medius/middle implies being center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...others tempt one off-center with suggested MEDIA.
c) One cannot define meaning...only motion can establish matter (life) at the center of momentum (inception towards death). Momentum implies balance within motion, and center of balance implies each ones free will of choice. Holding onto a definition imbalances ones choice.
To define implies to affix, which is why few suggest definitions to tempt many to affix suggested meaning/media (information) within mind/memory, while ignoring perceivable inspiration...which moves and cannot be held onto.
a) "that is non" implies "something is nothing"...a contradiction in terms.
b) "a" implies "a partial within whole"...how could a partial within whole perceive "nothing"?
c) NONE SEQUITUR - "in logic, "an inference or conclusion that does not follow from the premise"...logic/reason is based on the premise of ones consent to the suggestion by another.
Consenting to suggested implies following those suggesting it, while ignoring that perception (life) needs to resist perceivable (inception towards death) aka matter needing to resist momentum of motion for the sustenance of self.
Logic/logos (suggested words) tempts one to ignore pathos (perceivable sound). Motion operates on implication (if/then), hence if motion (inception towards death); then matter (life).
Matter tempts each other to ignore motion for reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; good vs bad etc.) over suggested definitions...which ones consent affixes within ones mind/memory.
It's ones free will of choice to adapt to perceivable implication (balance) or consent to suggested reason (imbalance)...those who ignore "ones choice" for suggestions by "chosen ones" are permitting others to exploit them, which is how a few manages to exploit a many.
a) What can you tell me about the truth of "no; not; nothingness" and the "self" thereof?
b) What if suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable (everything)? What if nothing implies ones denial/ignorance of everything?
Sleight of hand: "Neverending story confronted by the Nothing"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Neverending_Story
a) Absolute implies AB (away from) SOLVERE (to loosen, untie, release, detach)...a moving/changing process.
b) What if a moving whole separates itself into partials? What if internal separation generates resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) aka temporary growth within ongoing loss aka solid matter within fluid motion?
c) UN- implies "prefix of negation"...what if that implies ones choice to deny/ignore change?
c) How could one hold onto truth without compressing it within self? How can there be a differentiation in-between true and false without ATION (action/motion)?
d) What if the only thing which cannot change are the rules of how change operates? What if those rules allow growth of self discernment by those within change? What if rule implies "to direct in a straight line"?
Reductionist drivel. Address the argument, don't regurgitate semantics to me. I know the meaning of words I'm using but more importantly I'm aware of the context too which your autistic deconstruction fails to account for.
Meaning (suggested information) contradicts knowledge (perceivable inspiration).
-ist implies consent to -ism...where did I consent to suggested reductionism?
a) A mind arguing over suggested ignores to adapt to perceivable.
b) Address implies being (life) moved in a straight line (inception towards death)...addressing others tempts one to ignore that.
Consenting to suggested CON (together; with) TEXT (to weave) constricts ones awareness.
Few suggest an internal net (internet) to weave consenting many into its world wide web, which in return permits few to "pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He1TntAK2fs
The jew who coined autism and schizophrenia (eugene bleuler) and the jew coined father of psychoanalysis (sigismund schlomo freud) conspired to "conquer psychiatry"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
Psychoanalyzing others as autistic implies being conquered.
ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"...it's why I resist giving credit/creed/consent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism See anything familiar?
Radical Honesty What if we all told the truth?
kick everyone in the dick that doesnt think your garden is the shit.
a) current implies change.
b) CHANGE, verb- "to cause to pass from one state to another; to alter, or make different" aka to alter (life) from one state (inception) towards another (death).
Honest/honor (equitable) implies in dealing with others; radical/radius/race/ray implies as partial within whole.
Consider being ray (matter) within spectrum (momentum) of light (motion)...that's radical. Matter dealing with other matter implies superficial in ignorance of radical.
Sleight of hand: "no honor among thieves". Ignoring perceivable by taking suggested implies theft.
Instrument of offense/defense implies ones free will of choice...choosing a suggested side within a conflict of reason (truth vs lies) disarms ones weapon of choice.
Holding onto suggested truth contradicts ones FREE will of choice; while binding self to a chosen ones suggestion.
It's ones consent to suggested ideal-ism which plants suggested information into ones mind/memory as "true" or "false".
Idea (that which is seen) implies as perceived by oneself...not as shown by another ones suggestions.
That choice to wish/want to not offend another implies ones ignorance of needing to adapt to what nature offers.
All perceivable towards ones perception implies offer; while suggestions by others tempt one to take offense.
Suggested bread and butter tempts ones appetite; perceivable hunger forces ones adaptation.
Fear implies focusing on suggested outcome (death); being alive implies within origin (inception towards death). Others suggest outcomes to tempt ones focus to ignore origin.
Fear implies APPREHEN'SION, noun - "taking or arresting; the operation of the mind in contemplating ideas, without comparing them with others, or referring them to external objects"...
Sleight of hand: "fear is the mind-killer".
There's only one force (inception towards death) that generates life...ignoring this for suggested "evil forces" inverts ones mind....EVIL/LIVE.
omphaloskeptic