Most of the studies are false, biased or use scientifically unsound methodologies (even BMJ chief editor admitted that). Like the one they do to prove there is a virus. It's hilarious, viruses have never been purified/isolated - they don't exist.
100%. The volume of new papers versus the natural progression of new data has been greatly skewed in favor of quantity over quality. This is why the branding of "ideas" and products has exploded in the last 10 years in every field of science -- there is checks and balances when corporations are funding both the research and publishers.
Western Medicine was corrupted when oligarchs funded the creation of Big Pharma. There is a pivotal moment in the 1900-1910'sG when Rockefeller dumped all that money in to medicine that changed the course of health -- and not for the better -- but for the profitable.
Most of the studies are false, biased or use scientifically unsound methodologies (even BMJ chief editor admitted that). Like the one they do to prove there is a virus. It's hilarious, viruses have never been purified/isolated - they don't exist.
"Viruses" are protein negative-mutations caused by damaged DNA or bacterial infections -- not organism.
Ayh just wanted to get that out. :)
Well said..
My theory is not that they are “duplicating” pictures and reusing..
It’s that they aren’t doing the studies AT ALL
No one’s checking behind them
100%. The volume of new papers versus the natural progression of new data has been greatly skewed in favor of quantity over quality. This is why the branding of "ideas" and products has exploded in the last 10 years in every field of science -- there is checks and balances when corporations are funding both the research and publishers.
Western medicine became corrupted when Big Pharma was allowed to write the textbooks they use in med school
Western Medicine was corrupted when oligarchs funded the creation of Big Pharma. There is a pivotal moment in the 1900-1910'sG when Rockefeller dumped all that money in to medicine that changed the course of health -- and not for the better -- but for the profitable.
Thank Goodness for people like Sholto David!
Here's the original New York Times article:
A Columbia Surgeon’s Study Was Pulled. He Kept Publishing Flawed Data. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/15/science/columbia-cancer-surgeon-sam-yoon-flawed-data.html
EDIT: Here's the way around the NYT paywall: https://archive.is/IrUnr
Here's the blog post it sources:
Memorial Sloan Kettering Paper Mill https://forbetterscience.com/2023/11/01/memorial-sloan-kettering-paper-mill/