Our ruling class is still pagan
(www.eddiocracy.com)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Not a single mention of mecca.....why? Islamists dance around a black cube ...
Oh nevermind. Hidden away as a side thought it's there.......somehow only a side thought..haha
And for some f***in reason, in THOUSANDS OF YEARS, no one has asked WTF that's all about because the "rock from heaven" thing is bullshit 100%
Yet here we are :
https://ibb.co/w4ttdck
Praying Room Only . Haha!
What's really going on in that building? Looks fuckin SKETCH
Islam is wild.
The whole black stone from the idols thing. The manner in which it was established in general. The p3do stuff. That angel Muh4mmad talked to was for sure a demon.
a) -ist implies ones consent to a suggested -ism, hence Islam (submission).
b) Being implies in-between left/right + front/back + up/down aka within a cube aka CUE (to stand in line) BE (being) aka being (life) standing in line (inception towards death).
c) If being ignores self for others; then ignorance shrouds being (cube) in the absence of light (black).
d) Ignoring perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information) tempts one into conflicts of reason aka circular reasoning. One who suggests circular reasoning to others is called a kike; kikel; circle.
e) Kaaba aka cabbala aka quibbel (to receive, admit, accept) implies the one within cube being tempted to quibbel the suggestions from those outside.
f) Mecca aka mahrab aka sanctuary (Latin sanctus; holy) implies the perceivable whole/holy for each perceiving partial within.
Others suggest hegira (departure) and hajj (gathering) to de-part partials within whole by gathering many under suggestions of few.
a) Being implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...others tempt one with suggested sides to off-center self, when consenting to hold onto a side within a conflict of reason.
b) Hidden (concealed within oneself) knowledge (all perceivable) implies oneself choosing to hide from perceivable (inspiration), while permitting others to conceal with suggested (information). Holding onto information implies hiding self from moving inspiration.
why do you do this on every post?
An article on the black cube and modern Saturn worship.
Whatever they worship, it's not the Christian God which makes them pagan, so correct.
You guys don't know shit. Your knowledge and source of history starts from the times of Vatican purges and rewriting Christianity to be a control tool for feeble minds.
You need to go to sources older than that, to original texts.
You can chill out dude. Happy to talk to you if you got some points or something we should look at.
If you've really done your digging, you know learning this stuff takes time.
When you say the original texts, lemme know what you're talking about.
I have given them dozens of times on this forum. You don't read, You never read. You just remain in your ignorance. In your nice and safe "Christian" bubble.
A true mind can go beyond organized religion and understand world through philosophy and understand that religions are just feel good stories for those with a lesser mind, who can't face the emotions aroused by analytical research of human history, genesis and morality.
Still, here's some reading, as if it matters, because you won't read anything anyway:
Gilgames recent literal translation
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/779852.Gilgamesh
Sumerian texts (before torah, before bible, before christ):
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/27507664
Missing Lands - the oral lore of dozens of cultures that is thousands of years older than even the Sumerian texts:
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/45188001
Bhagavad Gita w/ literal translation :
https://www.goodreads.com/work/editions/46508954-a-comprehensive-guide-to-bhagavad-gita-with-literal-translation
Gāthās of Zoroaster
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/8092144
Oldest known pre-censored Toraha/Old Testament sources (before Council of Nicea, before Vatican rewrites, before the crappy James King bible shite):
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/124972434-gods-of-the-bible
Rest of Mauro Biglino's books (you can translate the Italian ones):
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/7489721.Mauro_Biglino
Eden series for the feeble minds who can't read modern translations of older texts (see above):
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1080597.Paul_Wallis?from_search=true&from_srp=true
Gods of eden, referencing pre-hebew, pre-judaism, pre-christianity sources, showing the grand narrative:
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/376048
You do realize that the idea of "pagan" is completely Christian created term to label, isolate, subjugate, kill and exterminate those who did not submit to the Vatican's rule?
Before the creation of a monotheistic judaism (c. 600BCE) and before the creation of proto-modern Christianity (c.350ish AD) and the later ensuing purge by satanic fake "christians" by Vatican, by Rome and European nations, EVERYBODY WAS PAGAN. And happy. And certainly did NOT worship Satan, because he hadn't even been invented at that time (yes, Christian "Satan" is a literal invention, combining Prometheus, Lucifer, Greek Pagan gods and various embodiments of evil and trickster together - shaken and stirred).
Assuming/implying Pagan = satanic = evil = anti-christian just shows how ignorant, unlearned and totally non-follower of Jesus one is.
Most Christians are so brainwashed, engaging in circular arguments, never learning ANYTHING beyond the KJV (which was collated in the 1600s, thousands of years later than the text I reference here).
"I have given them dozens of times on this forum. You don't read, You never read. You just remain in your ignorance. In your nice and safe "Christian" bubble."
Lol. Is that where you think I've been? Funny, all this time I was under the impression I'd been against Christianity for the last 15 years.
Looks at all the good read books... which aren't original sources.
Yea... It's me... I'm the religious one...
Good talk.
Like I told you, you don't read anything.
Good luck reading Sumerian cuneiform they are the original sources.
https://cdli.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/periods
I give up on you.
Latin textus (woven) implies uniting anything flexible together; hence reducing flexibility. Meanwhile...origin (inception towards death) generates flexibility (life).
"Because it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He1TntAK2fs
a) Towards (to) implies a single source (motion), hence each life within being moved from inception towards death.
b) That which sets apart is the source of weaving together (text).
c) Notice that religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies binding together, and that before religion, there was mystic/mist/misceo (to mix).
Before anything can be mixed and bound together; it has to be set apart, hence being implies one apart from one another.
Knowledge implies everything perceivable by each one within...others suggest nothing (don't) as the inversion thereof. This implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting consensual de-nial of perceivable.