Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

33
()
posted 1 year ago by pkvi_brand 1 year ago by pkvi_brand +36 / -3
19 comments share
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– freedomlogic 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

He must be referring to this.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/first-do-no-harm-201510138421

Literally an attempt to rewrite history and play some mental gymnastics.

While some medical schools ask their graduates to abide by the Hippocratic Oath, others use a different pledge — or none at all. And in fact, although "first, do no harm" is attributed to the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates, it isn't a part of the Hippocratic Oath at all. It is actually from another of his works called Of the Epidemics.

See technically, it wasnt part of the original one bla bla.

The idea that doctors should, as a starting point, not harm their patients is an appealing one. But doesn't that set the bar rather low? Of course no physician should set out to do something that will only be accompanied by predictable and preventable harm. We don't need an ancient ancestor, however well-respected, or an oath to convince us of that!

But if physicians took "first, do no harm" literally, no one would have surgery, even if it was lifesaving. We might stop ordering mammograms, because they could lead to a biopsy for a non-cancerous lump. In fact, we might not even request blood tests — the pain, bruising, or bleeding required to draw blood are clearly avoidable harms.

I mean that assumes that the doctor actually cares, most of them dont, and thats by design. Especially canadas death system.

You got doctors getting paid 30$ a visit with 10,000 people to look after. Of course they are gonna suffer compassion fatigue. They simply cannot care for this many people, even if they were all completely healthy!

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/medical-community-studying-physician-burnout-compassion-fatigue

Compassion fatigue is an erosion of the ability to tolerate strong emotions and difficult stories, Mathieu explained. It can manifest as a desensitization to patients’ issues and difficulty engaging both at work and at home. It accumulates over time and can resemble post-traumatic stress disorder.

Yeah, just another excuse to just not give a fuck.

These people do not care about the hippocratic oath, or if they did, they dont anymore.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-turning-away-home-grown-doctors-1.6743486

The college of physicians is the ones who control how many doctors go through the programs. They are intentionally destroying the system, proably so they can institute a two paid, two tier health system.

No ones held accountable when government idiots run the program, cant wait to see private companies gouging an doing whatever the fuck they want to the poors.

Godamn you shoulda seen the doctor and nurse and resident when I went to the endocrinologist and I told them I havent been able to work the last couple years since my phosphorous crashed out. Totally different demeanor.

Treating me like im fucking ricky from the trailer park boys looking for unemployment.

Godamn these people are peak retarded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Merely_a_conduit 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Big pharma writes the textbooks they use in "medical school" Western medicine is failing rapidly and they've medicated half the population with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors which if they serve a purpose it's not what is advertised

https://www.anxietycentre.com/research/ssris-virtually-ineffective/#:~:text=A%20few%20weeks%20ago%2C%20a%20study%20found%20that,or%20experienced%20no%20benefit%20when%20taking%20an%20SSRI.

What do you think happens when a hundred million people can't get the psychotropic medication they're now dependent on? Chaos.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy