A step in the right direction for sure. We’re active and I hate media but even we indulge in the shared family streaming every once in a while. Reacher and Jack Ryan we’re both tolerable in terms of PCness due a change. Although they still find a way to sneak it in, especially in Jack Ryan going out of their way to put women/minorities in every prominent role/power figure. At least a thought provoking/exciting plot. If it were up to me I don’t think I’d want a tv in our house at all but in moderation (and awareness of the goal of media to influence), I don’t think it’s the end of the world
I don't think that's the angle either given that he's basically giving the finger to the standard authority figures throughout the whole second season (including mil).
"Just fucking kill [the villain], arrests are pointless" is straight up not a narrative they want people thinking about, IMO, and I don't see any real redeeming (to the NWO) narrative that would justify getting people to sympathize with a vigilante (which if you'll notice, has become FAR more uncommon than it used to be in popular media).
He legit executes several of them "in cold blood". And I can't remember even one time the characters had a discussion about how just killing their enemies was bad because the law blah blah blah, they simply didn't even discuss it lol.
The movies with Tom Cruise were still relatively good despite being Hollywood. He just teams up with some gun club owner and carries out a massacre of the villains.
if we're talking about the books, those were pretty good up until 2014-2016. then Lee Child bought into the woke bullshit.
the first two movies based on the books were OK, but Tom Cruise isn't 6'6". and the uber-analytical mind that comes thru when the books do 1st person narrative doesn't come thru. if Jeffrey Donovan hadn't porked out after Burn Notice, he would have been a much better Jack Reacher. imho. ymmv.
Cruise and the studios are all part of the (((msm))). in the background somewhere, there's a narrative (((they))) are trying to push.
Tom Cruise portrayed Reacher the way he almost always portrays his characters- as a troubled manchild. Think of the hero he played in War of the Worlds. It was very similar.
Not something made by my enemies no. There is actually no human requirement for television. Humans don't even need to consume fiction at all. I've gone years without any kind of fiction and the only side effect from it was getting better at my career and learning more about science.
But if you need fiction there are books made by authors who are not beholden to Jewish financiers or Satanists. Creating a novel is far less controlled than producing a TV show.
a) Being implies departure; reaching out tempts one to ignore that.
b) Others suggest one to "reach out and touch faith"; while tempting with "I will deliver, you know I'm a forgiver"...aka the happy merchant doing his buying/selling routine.
During his travels, Reacher crosses paths with dangerous criminals and is forced to do battle.
a) Departure positions one at center (life) of circumference (inception towards death)...others tempt one to travel outwards, away from center.
b) Inception towards death implies horizontal; life growing within loss implies vertical...vertical during horizontal implies the cross one needs to bear.
Crossing with others implies a double-cross aka TREASON, noun (Latin traho; draw and drag)...perceivable inspiration one draws from; suggested information one drags around.
c) Consenting (want or not want) to the suggested information by others establishes the battle aka conflict of reason (want versus not want), while being within perceivable implies being want within need...hence being tempted to drag (want) while ignoring to draw (need).
jack reacher
JACK aka JACOB (Hebrew Ya'aqobh) - "one that takes by the heel; a supplanter" + SUPPLANT', verb - "to remove or displace by stratagem; or to displace and take the place of; to overthrow; to undermine; to dispossess; to usurp etc."
There's your happy merchant of temptation usurping (by suggestion) ones reach (consent)...if one chooses to fall for it.
They need to up recruitment numbers with a certain demographic so showcasing those archetype helps that cause
A step in the right direction for sure. We’re active and I hate media but even we indulge in the shared family streaming every once in a while. Reacher and Jack Ryan we’re both tolerable in terms of PCness due a change. Although they still find a way to sneak it in, especially in Jack Ryan going out of their way to put women/minorities in every prominent role/power figure. At least a thought provoking/exciting plot. If it were up to me I don’t think I’d want a tv in our house at all but in moderation (and awareness of the goal of media to influence), I don’t think it’s the end of the world
I don't think that's the angle either given that he's basically giving the finger to the standard authority figures throughout the whole second season (including mil).
"Just fucking kill [the villain], arrests are pointless" is straight up not a narrative they want people thinking about, IMO, and I don't see any real redeeming (to the NWO) narrative that would justify getting people to sympathize with a vigilante (which if you'll notice, has become FAR more uncommon than it used to be in popular media).
Based lol.
He legit executes several of them "in cold blood". And I can't remember even one time the characters had a discussion about how just killing their enemies was bad because the law blah blah blah, they simply didn't even discuss it lol.
Exactly it’s based.
Haha yeah my wife and I both liked this season more than the first because of the based vigilantism and the total lack of any equivocation.
The movies with Tom Cruise were still relatively good despite being Hollywood. He just teams up with some gun club owner and carries out a massacre of the villains.
Of course they need Whites in the military because they know that the diversity hires won’t fight properly in a war.
if we're talking about the books, those were pretty good up until 2014-2016. then Lee Child bought into the woke bullshit.
the first two movies based on the books were OK, but Tom Cruise isn't 6'6". and the uber-analytical mind that comes thru when the books do 1st person narrative doesn't come thru. if Jeffrey Donovan hadn't porked out after Burn Notice, he would have been a much better Jack Reacher. imho. ymmv.
Cruise and the studios are all part of the (((msm))). in the background somewhere, there's a narrative (((they))) are trying to push.
Tom Cruise portrayed Reacher the way he almost always portrays his characters- as a troubled manchild. Think of the hero he played in War of the Worlds. It was very similar.
They throw out some meat and you're eating it up. Not wise.
We are in a world where having White people in commercials is ‘violent racism’.
It’s no surprise a rare bit of based media slips through and people gobble it up.
Not something made by my enemies no. There is actually no human requirement for television. Humans don't even need to consume fiction at all. I've gone years without any kind of fiction and the only side effect from it was getting better at my career and learning more about science.
But if you need fiction there are books made by authors who are not beholden to Jewish financiers or Satanists. Creating a novel is far less controlled than producing a TV show.
But how do you advertise a based self published book?
That's a good question. I wouldn't read any book recommendations from Jewish owned publications generally.
I found C-SPAN book tv was pretty good. I found at least one book from there.
a) Being implies departure; reaching out tempts one to ignore that.
b) Others suggest one to "reach out and touch faith"; while tempting with "I will deliver, you know I'm a forgiver"...aka the happy merchant doing his buying/selling routine.
https://genius.com/Depeche-mode-personal-jesus-lyrics
a) Departure positions one at center (life) of circumference (inception towards death)...others tempt one to travel outwards, away from center.
b) Inception towards death implies horizontal; life growing within loss implies vertical...vertical during horizontal implies the cross one needs to bear.
Crossing with others implies a double-cross aka TREASON, noun (Latin traho; draw and drag)...perceivable inspiration one draws from; suggested information one drags around.
c) Consenting (want or not want) to the suggested information by others establishes the battle aka conflict of reason (want versus not want), while being within perceivable implies being want within need...hence being tempted to drag (want) while ignoring to draw (need).
JACK aka JACOB (Hebrew Ya'aqobh) - "one that takes by the heel; a supplanter" + SUPPLANT', verb - "to remove or displace by stratagem; or to displace and take the place of; to overthrow; to undermine; to dispossess; to usurp etc."
There's your happy merchant of temptation usurping (by suggestion) ones reach (consent)...if one chooses to fall for it.
I know plenty of libs who watch it and like it.
It's fine.