The idea that "nazis burned books" is evidently vital to (((them))) because they brigaded the hell out of this r/conspiracy post: "What books did the nazis actually burn?" (Scroll down to my comment there to find out that, no, Nazis didn't burn any) - Conspiracies

The idea that "nazis burned books" is evidently vital to (((them))) because they brigaded the hell out of this r/conspiracy post: "What books did the nazis actually burn?" (Scroll down to my comment there to find out that, no, Nazis didn't burn any) (www.reddit.com)

posted 287 days ago by Primate98 287 days ago by Primate98 +20 / -2

13 comments

13 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (13)

sorted by:

▲ 9 ▼

– Xaviermgk 9 points 287 days ago +9 / -0

I like the one comment on there that says they "burned any evidence of having gas chambers".

One then wonders why didn't just raze the buildings at Auschwitz, which were CLEARLY modified after the fact.

Which, you know, they use as evidence of gas chambers. LOL

Comments in there are pretty good. One even called Hirschfeld the Epstein of his era, which is rather plausible, seeing as how he was out on extended "tours" often.

permalink parent save report block reply