Someone hatched a plan to hijack the labels 'left' and 'liberal' and assign them to a group of humans that didn't even exist; a fictional group with the following traits:
• Pro war
• Anti-free-speech
• Blind trust in government agencies
• Worship of mainstream 'science' and mainstream academia
• Worship of 'vaccines' and pharma corporations like Pfizer & Moderna
• Worship of GMO's and gene manipulation corporations like Monsanto
• Worship of anything related to homosexuality
• Admiration of societal menaces like Bill Gates & Anthony Fauci
• Blind trust in mainstream media
• Advocacy of complete public disarmament
• Advocacy of mandatory insurance
• Advocacy of the sexualization of children
• Racism against white people
• Sexism against males
• Anti-conspiracy-theory
• All sorts of other crazy shit (something new every few months)
The hope being that, over time, with the use of millions of bots & shills, this fictional group would - via the mindless pack-following of the youth - become an actual group; and actual liberals would no longer have a label at all, or would be referred to as libertarians, moderates or moderate conservatives.
Liberal implies free (liber) within all (al)...using ones free will of choice to consent to suggested labels upon all perceivable, binds one to another.
a) All suggested groups (plural) are fictitious, because each one (singular) within has to first ignore perceivable reality to be part of it.
b) PLU'RAL, adjective (Latin pluralis, from plus, pluris, more.]...being implies ones (partial) within oneness (whole), and so there cannot be more than one, for all is one in energy.
Tell me...what could be more than energy (internal/inherent power)?
Hi! Did you get my last message?
It clearly wasn't your last...also still no mic; no social media accounts; no telephones; and too much discernment to fall for temptations.
Last also means “previous”
What is the temptation don’t want to fall for?
a) L'AST, adjective - "that follows all the others; beyond which there is no more"
b) Wanted temptation implies ignoring needed resistance. If one chooses want over need, then one enters a want vs don't want conflict of reason; both sides of which diminish ones resistance.
c) Falling for suggested tempts one to ignore being (life) within fall (inception towards death).
From a bible perspective (Genesis 3): Ignoring fall of man (perceivable) by falling for other men (suggested) implies temptation.