Graphene is diamagnetic. Like copper or bismuth.

Graphene oxide is paramagnetic, like aluminium or platinum.

Paramagnetic is barely react to magnetic field. Diamagnetic is pushed out from magnetic field. None of both, even in pure form could hold any available magnet, not even talking about some sparse particles in amount of micrograms.

It is ferromagnetics that could be attracted by magnets with significant force.

So, magnetic properties of mRNA jab spot could be proof of some ferromagnetic, like iron, cobalt, nickel or rare-earth alloys like iron or cobalt with addition of neodymium or samarium in a jab, but in no way it could be a proof of presence of grapthene or graphene oxide.

Does it really matter what bullshit you stick to - that jabs are "safe and effective" or that jabs "have tons of graphene, 5G receivers, WiFi8 routers and bluetooth controlled laser nanomachines"?

I don't see any difference, really. It's all just ignorance and dnial of knowledge.

PS: does anybody know why exactly such hillarious failure like graphene had been choosen as scarecrow for idiots? No material on the Eart ever had such enormous expectations and marketing bullshit along with total absence of any real usefulness for over 150 years? And don't even try to talk about some Super-Absorbing Nanotecnology Vacuum Cleaner Exhaust Filter with Graphene Nanotubes Coating you bought online, which is really just cheap chineese paper filter slightly powdered with charcoal powder.