One thing i’ve struggled to find is a good reason for support of Israel. From the general public I mean, not from politicians who just keep using the grift but actual American citizens. For the life of me i can’t think of a single reason anyone in north america gives two shits about the middle east at all, much less support and quote the tired “muh greatest ally” crap. Where did the push for this come from? How did it start? Was it newspaper propaganda slowly inserting it to where the normies simply accepted it to be truth? Was it something they drilled into you in grade school and it never got questioned later?
Ignoring the entire jew angle for a moment here, greatest ally for what? What help has ever been given to get this title? FRANCE I can see as America’s best ally after the help in the revolutionary war of independence, the whole gifting of the statue of liberty etc. but what has Israel ever done? We know about the U.S.S. Liberty, we know they did espionage for nuclear weapon tech, they don’t exactly keep the middle east secure and quiet and keep the muslims in check at all. Just WHAT is the deal?
Im early 40’s, and have yet to see anything positive in regards to Israel (or the middle East in general to be honest) to the point where i might not even grunt in affirmation to hear that the whole region is now a glowing ocean crater(fiery but mostly peaceful nuclear protest you see). Those who grew up when support for Israel was being pushed, what did you see to cause this?
This is what I have read https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/nostra-aetate
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostra_aetate
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cUFQiR0goivH/ Scofield bible (haven't watched this but will and will edit if weird to a better link). Ok it's a good video (I watched).
This is probably worth including as well and you can dig deeper to find this is true of many old maps : https://www.bitchute.com/video/PvzwFsiUjPTt/
I believe the Jewish people themselves have also been deceived. While many people don't like every thing about MLK I believe he is right about every individual should be judged by their character and not skin an important note to remember in a time I believe people are intentionally being divided.
I was raised extremely pro Israel. And it wasn't until I was older I gave it much thought as to why everyone in my church was so pro Israel nor did I care about politics, wars or much outside my bubble of existence. As far as I knew Jewish people were just like us except they didn't believe in the new testament, this is what I was taught.
Individual implies within division. It's your beliefs which contradict your state of being.
Yeah but it's a division by individual characteristics not division by groups which often as in the race of a person one has no control of.
a) Race (Latin raddix; radius; ray) implies through one outwards...not which out group one chooses to be part of. Being also implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable), hence radius radiating outwards into circumference through ones senses.
Inception towards death implies LINE, hence lineage for each living radius within. Sleight of hand: "race to the bottom line".
b) To control implies to restrain; being implies "free" will of choice; hence being free within STRAIN (to stretch). Inception towards death implies the stretch; the life within the free will of choice, momentarily unrestrained.
In other words...only if nature is in control can those within be free to choose, yet what is it that those within nature choose? More control over each other.
c) "division by groups" implies a divided one (partial within whole) joining with other ones into a group. This is called collectivism; it's being suggested by few to tempt many together, while nature continuous to divide everything (whole) into each thing (partials).
To make this more simple...off-spring implies division from another, not joining with another.
Notice that all those who want to join into groups, afterwards try desperately to stand out from all the others...like wearing a uniform to be part of a group; just to do anything to get promotions over others.
d) Character implies a mark made upon form, hence an engraving of characteristics into malleable form within a flowing system. The initial division implies from flow (whole) into form (partials)...the "character" marks are made afterwards.
Sleight of hand: "people always tell me; you're quite a character"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
BUT implies that you have an issue with division; yet YEAH implies versus NAY aka a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) aka a division against one another.
If one grows self discernment as partial within whole, then there's no BUT (except; besides; unless) to whole. Sleight of hand...BUTT-HOLE. Many are making themselves the but-end of a joke the few suggested them to play on each other.
Well I suppose it's up to one to believe they are divided by individual characteristics or not. Humanity no doubt is a whole in some ways as in I do believe we are all connected. In order to function as a whole we all need different talents and interest. So is being an individual actually a division or just being part of the whole? I don't agree we should be divided in groups based on those interests either. As in you want to be punk rock so you only hang out with other punk rock kids. Or if you are gay you only hang out with gay people. These are false identities and not actually anything to do with who someone is at the core. The tribal group no matter what it is is one I think that divides people. In my mind an ideal humanity wouldn't need others to tell them their likes or needs but each person would know what they each like and who they are. If humanity truly each followed one's passions I believe we would function better. Most people are afraid to do what they love so they end up going to work in an office or some unfulfilling job. People do this out of fear of failure and desire for security so imo to find some self worth or identity they join some group that then reassures them that they have an identity and purpose even though the group is a superficial identity. The division I believe that is being forced on people is separation into these false identity groups, race, interest, activism, political beliefs and so on. So when I say individual I truly mean this. Why do people only need to hang out with others just like them? Isn't that boring? I have never understood the group mentality and always had peers of all sorts and found it much more interesting. You could use the actual human body as an example. If ears only grew with other ears and refused to grow with other parts of the body they would not be able to function and would die. Until humans start valuing ones own true identity I believe we will be out of balance.