No 5G chip in 5G phones?
(nitter.net)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
Didn't saw any chips at all. Dude shows empty phone case without PCB. What's the point? Is it kind of joke?
Even with PCB it will be hard to distinguish, say, Qualcomm Snapdragon X24 (with 4G) from Snapdragon X50 (with 5G) ICs f.e. they have pretty similar BGA package. Macro footage with IC marking needed to tell anything about internals of modern phone. And that's in case SDR approach is not used, when list of supported standards depends on firmware and not on the IC model.
This 5G shit is a psyop
Not really. It is a very probable and real danger, but by completely another reasons.
Shortly, the only difference of 5G in comparison with previous cellular network generations is enhanced bandwidth between user device and base station. However, today even 3G bandwidth is not utilised fully, because of absense of wide enough uplinks from base staions to network backbone, not even speaking about 4G and 5G. So, there is no any need for enhanced bandwidth for consumers, it can't be ultilised by customers because of narrow uplinks. But there is perfect reason for much higher bandwith between user device and base station for total surveillance agenda. As I see how it is implemented - every 5G base station have local temporary storage of surveillance data. High-bandwith constant surveillance streams from all end-user devices stored locally on base stations. If surveillance state need an access to that surveillance data of specific person, it just download corresponding records from base station. It is perfect scheme of total surveillance system. No need for any centralized storage for insane amount of data or giant network of high-bandwith uplinks to every base station. It is also highly distributed, so very reliable. Only thing needed comparing to 3G/4G is higher bandwidth between user device and base station and some not very large storage at base station.
All that bullshit about "5G is harmful" or "5G is a weapon" is to distract those who suspect something weird about 5G from the aforementioned real 5G threat for people. Pretty traditional move of TPTB - to pose those who try to ask reasonable questions as insane lunatics who spread bullshit that could be easily debunked, created on purpose by TPTB puppets and pushed to every single alt-media.
Well I have a 5g phone supposedly however when I go to the closest big city that has 5g towers I can barely even use the Internet. It's so slow it can barely even use maps. My town has 4g and phone works just fine.
Problem is not in whateverG. Problem is in uplinks from base stations. Large cities does not have enough bandwidth between stations and internet to properly serve a lot of clients. Small cities have less cliens, so uplinks are not so overloaded.
Cellular network is not just your phone and some abstract Google or Apple services. It is a multilayer system with many bottlenecks and places where something could go wrong. 5G/4G/xG is only tiny part of it and not the one that exclusively define overall performance.
Changing oldG to newG will change absolutely nothing for user without respective rebuilding of other layers nobody bother about since 3G introduction.
Interesting.
My favorite part about this con is that it's actually just a marketing label that in the past has had trouble with defining specs etc. That's why we went from 3 to 5 so quickly. There was '4g' then the 'real one' at '4glte'. Definitely one of the weaker psyops that gets pumped around here.