No, that hasn't been made public (that I know of).
Yet, it is as I've written, a matter of training reinforcement.
Hollywood and mega-budget game companies have the best data: they have all the 3D face-body-movement capture mappings down to 4K res and 120fps speeds with multi-hundred anchor points for each frame. Training sets on those models is much faster and gives much higher fidelity output than just training with crummy 2D youtube video files.
There are already AI actors in movies since few years and most normal people can't tell a difference. Some still use motion capture, but everything else is generated.
My take is that one day somebody will reveal that X (<- can be actor, anchor, news reporter, celbrity) was 100% fully "AI" generated in it's public appearance nobody noticed anything when it came out.
Then people will get it. And by that time it's already a few years too late.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MikbhfH28A
Curious. was there 2 hours ago. Here's a lower res copy quickly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecHioH8fawE
No, that hasn't been made public (that I know of).
Yet, it is as I've written, a matter of training reinforcement.
Hollywood and mega-budget game companies have the best data: they have all the 3D face-body-movement capture mappings down to 4K res and 120fps speeds with multi-hundred anchor points for each frame. Training sets on those models is much faster and gives much higher fidelity output than just training with crummy 2D youtube video files.
There are already AI actors in movies since few years and most normal people can't tell a difference. Some still use motion capture, but everything else is generated.
My take is that one day somebody will reveal that X (<- can be actor, anchor, news reporter, celbrity) was 100% fully "AI" generated in it's public appearance nobody noticed anything when it came out.
Then people will get it. And by that time it's already a few years too late.