Well, dude get in hands EMF meter for the first time, without knowing anything about it in particular and electromagnetic fields in whole, but placing radioactivity sign with confidence. :)
At the same time he didn't even tried to place EMF meter near his beloved iPhone with TikTok playing his video. Why is it so?
Really, problem is not in that dude, problem in those who watch and thoughtlessly swallow such crap.
Human unwillingness to know how things they use and have around really work should be a crime. With jail time, preferrably.
Yeah he went from measuring nothing / background noise to measuring a signal of some sort but really didn't but effort into analyzing whether such a signal was dangerous or even abnormal
He is measuring electrostatic field which is clearly indicated on EMF-360 screen (EF and V/m units). With high probability he is measuring electrostatic field of slightly charged plastic blinds on window.
V/m value that he shows means that some electrostatic charge create a field with intensity, such, that it will create a potential difference of shown number of Volts on distance of 1m
Very low figures, really. Petting a cat in dry weather gives orders of magnitude larger values in kV/m if not MV/m.
Level of electromagnetic radiation is displayed in top left corner in mW/m² with RF label. and it does not change at all, as he waving with device aroung the room. If he put device near his phone during call or intense data exchange, this number will jump from this 0.002 mW/m² to something like 5-10mW/m²
but the volume of ambient EM shd not be that high.
The level of ambient EMF is written in lower left segment of the screen. It is 0.7 mG. It is even marked "EMF". 0.7 milliGauss is 500 times less than magnetic field of Earth. Magnet on your fridge have around 50-100 Gauss. 10000 Gauss = 1 Tesla.
Dude is excited about the level of static charge of plastic blinds on the window, which are slightly electrfied by robbing one on the other when he approach to the window. That is what this V/m indication on the right side of device display means.
Dude is either dumb idiot, who bought GQ EMF-360 for $80 and didn't even bother to find out what it measure and what measured values means, either worse - he intentionally creating doomer hype out of nothing.
My theory is that such videos made purposedly on salary paid by the same people who pay for articles in MSM and influencers in social media, with intent to poison any existing alternative platform with total crap.
But the most miraclous thing - is why users of such alternative platforms who thorougly question any MSM crap, somehow forgot to do that with the crap that made by the same bastards, but for alternative target audience?
Everybody here say "Question everything!", but somehow that "everything" does not include things that manufactured specifically to hook those who for whatever reason lost any trust in MSM.
Fortunately, not everybody here fall to such crap, but really only few really bother to really question stuff that runs here.
It's some insanity, seriously. And for unknown for me reason nobody want to discuss THAT, very important question. And it is very important, because if you have garbage on input, you will get nothing except garbage on the output.
I don't see anything that could produce that tiny level of electrostatic field he show.
Ayh just took my meter
What model?
5G and 6G ... WIFI, neighboring WIFI, ambient RF ...
Do you understand that dude brag about value on the meter that describe electrostatic charge?
Value of RF flux you are talking about is pretty low and does not change through the whole clip and is 0.002 mW/m² even with "RF" label on the screen.
That 0.002 mW/m² is pretty valid for the environment you described without his phone transmitter on near the device.
You have to know, that RF power density is proportional to the square of distance. To get a noticeable rise from such weak sources like WiFi (max ~30mW) of whatever you have to bring EMF meter close to transmitter. Dude didn't do that in video. And background that is composed from everything you told about is somewhere near shown figure.
Well, dude get in hands EMF meter for the first time, without knowing anything about it in particular and electromagnetic fields in whole, but placing radioactivity sign with confidence. :)
At the same time he didn't even tried to place EMF meter near his beloved iPhone with TikTok playing his video. Why is it so?
Really, problem is not in that dude, problem in those who watch and thoughtlessly swallow such crap.
Human unwillingness to know how things they use and have around really work should be a crime. With jail time, preferrably.
0.002 mW/m² is the EMF power density of Bluetooth
Yeah he went from measuring nothing / background noise to measuring a signal of some sort but really didn't but effort into analyzing whether such a signal was dangerous or even abnormal
He is measuring electrostatic field which is clearly indicated on EMF-360 screen (EF and V/m units). With high probability he is measuring electrostatic field of slightly charged plastic blinds on window.
V/m value that he shows means that some electrostatic charge create a field with intensity, such, that it will create a potential difference of shown number of Volts on distance of 1m
Very low figures, really. Petting a cat in dry weather gives orders of magnitude larger values in kV/m if not MV/m.
Level of electromagnetic radiation is displayed in top left corner in mW/m² with RF label. and it does not change at all, as he waving with device aroung the room. If he put device near his phone during call or intense data exchange, this number will jump from this 0.002 mW/m² to something like 5-10mW/m²
Device user manual: https://www.gqelectronicsllc.com/GQ-EMF-360V2-380V2-390_UserGuide.pdf
Man I fucking LOVE your crazy Russian ass! Happy new year!
The level of ambient EMF is written in lower left segment of the screen. It is 0.7 mG. It is even marked "EMF". 0.7 milliGauss is 500 times less than magnetic field of Earth. Magnet on your fridge have around 50-100 Gauss. 10000 Gauss = 1 Tesla.
Seriously, I even posted a link to complete user manual for the device used. Could post it again - https://www.gqelectronicsllc.com/GQ-EMF-360V2-380V2-390_UserGuide.pdf
Dude is excited about the level of static charge of plastic blinds on the window, which are slightly electrfied by robbing one on the other when he approach to the window. That is what this V/m indication on the right side of device display means.
Dude is either dumb idiot, who bought GQ EMF-360 for $80 and didn't even bother to find out what it measure and what measured values means, either worse - he intentionally creating doomer hype out of nothing.
My theory is that such videos made purposedly on salary paid by the same people who pay for articles in MSM and influencers in social media, with intent to poison any existing alternative platform with total crap.
But the most miraclous thing - is why users of such alternative platforms who thorougly question any MSM crap, somehow forgot to do that with the crap that made by the same bastards, but for alternative target audience?
Everybody here say "Question everything!", but somehow that "everything" does not include things that manufactured specifically to hook those who for whatever reason lost any trust in MSM.
Fortunately, not everybody here fall to such crap, but really only few really bother to really question stuff that runs here.
It's some insanity, seriously. And for unknown for me reason nobody want to discuss THAT, very important question. And it is very important, because if you have garbage on input, you will get nothing except garbage on the output.
I don't see anything that could produce that tiny level of electrostatic field he show.
What model?
Do you understand that dude brag about value on the meter that describe electrostatic charge?
Value of RF flux you are talking about is pretty low and does not change through the whole clip and is 0.002 mW/m² even with "RF" label on the screen.
That 0.002 mW/m² is pretty valid for the environment you described without his phone transmitter on near the device.
You have to know, that RF power density is proportional to the square of distance. To get a noticeable rise from such weak sources like WiFi (max ~30mW) of whatever you have to bring EMF meter close to transmitter. Dude didn't do that in video. And background that is composed from everything you told about is somewhere near shown figure.