A few years ago I would have wanted the degeneracy to get worse and worse in the hope people would wake up. The idea of transgenders reading to children about their male periods and commercials and sitcoms where historical figures are presented as only niggers would have been something I’d support in the hope it would force people to wake up. It hasn’t.
It’s shocking just how extreme society is getting and how people seem unable to realize that.
I think we always have to keep in mind that the number of people pushing this degeneracy is very, very small. Everybody else is just along for the ride. Demonstrably, none of them ever thought it up by themselves.
My point is that if the force of this tiny group went away, everything would return back to normal. I would even go so far as to say that society would steadily improve, given that most people are inherently good and that numerous people work in the spirit of enlightenment and universal beneficence.
Oy vey how antisemitic!
Humanism won't cut it either. So much evil is done because people believe they are "inherently good" as they trust in their media and leadership because after all those people are "inherently good" too right? They are inherently fallen and in need of salvation.
There is no true enlightenment without repentance and the holy spirit.
Well, see, you seem to think you're good, right? Maybe it's not the underlying nature itself, but the very certainty about it that's the problem.
That's a very typical left wing type of thinking (though perhaps you don't consider yourself a left winger). So I don't see how your way of thinking leads to better outcomes.
The world embraced humanism over a Biblical worldview a long ago, and in the 1960s onward they embraced moral relativism with also hypocritically a strange kind of progressive moralism.
So proper moral certainty and Biblical morality isn't the problem and didn't lead here. It was its rejection that led here. And it certainly hasn't been my problem in life but rather what changed my life around.
It's like people don't actually read this book. You'll have to guess which one I got it from. People just like to beat each other over the head with it.
Regrettable, and I reject such action. And don't bother replaying with, "That's what you just did!" because it will just make everyone laugh.
It is very, very large.
That is just Hamas in 2006. They have a lot more people now.
They don't need to worry about money, either.
That is the faction supporting the PLO/PFLP while working for Russia, in case you were wondering where all of those pro-Palestine protests were coming from.
Anyone who thinks that the Rockefellers, George Soros, and Bill Gates call any shots and actually set policy has not done nearly enough research. It's so far off it can be considered disinformation at this point.
An elderly Hungarian Nazi-collaborator Jew billionaire thinks Black Lives Matter goes to the top of his list of things to take care of before he kicks it? It's laughable.
a) What if push (inception towards death) shoves (life)? What if push cannot go away; only tempt shove to ignore itself? What if others exploit ones ignorance to utilize pushing force (velocity) against shoving force (resistance)?
b) Point implies end of sentence; being implies life-sentence. Went away implies out of way; being implies within (life) way (inception towards death). Return back implies back to origin; being (life) implies in (inception) and out (death) of origin. Normal implies common; being implies unique.
All of these tempt shove (growth) to go with push (loss) instead of resisting.
a) People implies mass of persons aka plural of singular...singular is smaller than plural.
b) Number implies designation of unit aka Latin unitas; unus; one...what could be smaller than one?
a) Does life being moved from inception towards death steadily improve or decline?
b) Society; from root SEKW (to follow). If life follows from inception towards death instead of resisting, then...?
c) What if steady (inception towards death) sets loose (life)? Again...what if steady (balance) sets loose (free will of choice)?
d) Who suggests the many to "go steady" or "ready; steady; go" or "rocksteady"?