Why do only jews have well-funded organizations that exist solely to censor their critics?
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
They use their nepotism, to destroy any such organization that could challenge their power. They control the media (the soap box) They have ways to undermine voting (the ballet box) There are many jewish lawyers and have money to bribe and threaten (the jury box) The last box of Liberty is called (the cartridge box), its why the want to restrict gun ownership for others not them.
Any such organization that are allowed to exists are typically formed and run by jews. Mostly when Gay, Feminist, political, colored orgs benefit them in some way.
Maybe because they have a plan and this is part of that plan? 🤔
Because they have monopoly power over the central bank and unlimited access to fiat capital financing. Did you think that a Jew goes into a Jew bank and gets denied a loan? Or that a Jew must exchange physical labor for fiat federal reserve notes?
That's what I'm talking about, Babylonian Money Magic & The Banking Priesthood. The Khazarians were also descendants of Babylon. They converted to Judaism, because this way there were no religious laws against usury. As opposed to the Christians who were forbidden to practice.
Furthermore, this Babylonian money-magic established the substitution of paper credit certificates for gold and silver deposits, which allowed people to travel with their money in a form that offered easy replacement should they lose the certificates or have them stolen. Babylonian Money Magic has been one of the most important tools designed to make their plan, world domination, succeed.
This is something the nazis would do. Ironic.
More like "standard."
Jews have controlled money for centuries. They eventually infiltrated and took over opposing organizations that were wealthy, such as the Catholic Church, and Western governments. By the middle ages they already had enough money to indebt European kings.
That's jew money, too.
a) if "everyone's a critic", then why critic others?
b) organization aka organ (instrument; implement) within tion (action) implies reaction. "Chosen ones" implies chosen by the reactions of other ones, hence being permitted to implement suggestion into other instruments.
c) being implies instrument (partial perception) within sound (entire perceivable).
Furthermore; semitic, from Hebrew shema - "to hear"...what others utter (suggested words) distracts one from hearing (perceivable sound).
Nature as the sole conservatoire teaches those with ears to hear about roulade; cadenza; trilling and quavering...all thorough one single nightingale. It's wind that teaches rhythmic tune through upward and downward rush, and the billows at shores teach how to delicately draw chords for playing arpeggio. Unpronounceable words is how perceivable sound teaches scales to each ones instrument of perception.
Listening to others tempts one to corrupt shema (hearing) within shame (to cover). Suggested music implies SHAM (a trick put upon one, a hoax, a fraud, something that deludes or disappoints expectation) and inflicts harmony (harm onto one) and melody (mellowing one).