Who said it was? I said you ought recognize and admit your mistake
In this case, calling out your attempts to distract and use non-sequitur is no mistake.
that does not and cannot prove that they were not a bot in the past or will not be a bot in the future once that bot detection is circumvented.
In what way does an AI/avatar become human later? Please don't answer in a theoretical sense, but in an actual sense. How, physically, does this happen?
Suppressing/ignoring such "baseless accusation" and other distraction
You again acknowledge that what you wrote was a distraction
In this case, calling out your attempts to distract and use non-sequitur is no mistake.
Who said it was? It sounds like you, once again, need to re-read what i have written. I already clarified explicitly what your mistake was in the previous comment... Speaking of things bots cannot do - reading comprehension is high on the list.
In what way does an AI/avatar become human later?
They are swapped out. The human is invoked (sometimes) to circumvent the bot detection, then the bot goes back to work. Or a bot account which has been discovered is replaced with a real human in an attempt to hide the fact that they were a bot. There are many examples.
You again acknowledge that what you wrote was a distraction
You again fail to grasp context :( Bot detection +1.
It was interpreted by you (incorrectly) as "baseless accusation" and "distraction" designed to derail the conversation. As a result YOU proceeded to derail the conversation. If it had been intended to derail the conversation, you would have done all my work for me.
You said I have to admit to my mistake. I have made no mistake in my interaction here.
They are swapped out.
On a better medium we can confirm the discussion we had on this thread (and others) to ensure we are both speaking honestly, and affirming the points we made previously. We can communicate more directly and respond to points in real time and avoid the confusion of whether or not I'm a bot in that moment.
Correct. And i also explicitly told you what that mistake was. Go back and read it, if you are capable.
I have made no mistake in my interaction here
If your intention was to derail the conversation, abandon its topic, and continue doing that ad infinitum - then i suppose that might be true. If you truly wanted to keep the conversation on topic and avoid distraction/tangent (as you claimed) then you have made nothing but mistakes since overreacting to a minor comment a dozen or so posts ago.
Pride is a fool's fortress and shame's cloak. Cast it off if you can.
and avoid the confusion of whether or not I'm a bot in that moment.
That's just my point. We can't avoid that confusion. Real time bots are already capable of generating such real time content.
But as i said, it's all moot - because if you cannot remedy/avoid the bot like tendencies that are preventing the conversation from being worthwhile - then it doesn't matter what forum/medium this conversation takes place in or if your are a bot or not.
This format is vastly better for such discussions anyway. It gives you unlimited time to compose your thoughts, and to respond to specific content which you have a concrete record of (as opposed to a real time discussion in which, typically, you have neither).
And it was no mistake. My actions have been intentional and I stand by them.
If your intention was
My intention, currently, is to set the record straight on any further interactions we have by addressing the fact that you think I might be a bot. At this point, it can only be done through more efficient mediums.
We can't avoid that confusion
Of course we can. Through real-time interaction through voice and/or video.
(as opposed to a real time discussion in which, typically, you have neither).
It's quite easy to research and pull up facts in real time. It's in fact very beneficial so that we can point out specific bits we want to pay more attention to, and discuss them together.
In this case, calling out your attempts to distract and use non-sequitur is no mistake.
In what way does an AI/avatar become human later? Please don't answer in a theoretical sense, but in an actual sense. How, physically, does this happen?
You again acknowledge that what you wrote was a distraction
Who said it was? It sounds like you, once again, need to re-read what i have written. I already clarified explicitly what your mistake was in the previous comment... Speaking of things bots cannot do - reading comprehension is high on the list.
They are swapped out. The human is invoked (sometimes) to circumvent the bot detection, then the bot goes back to work. Or a bot account which has been discovered is replaced with a real human in an attempt to hide the fact that they were a bot. There are many examples.
You again fail to grasp context :( Bot detection +1.
It was interpreted by you (incorrectly) as "baseless accusation" and "distraction" designed to derail the conversation. As a result YOU proceeded to derail the conversation. If it had been intended to derail the conversation, you would have done all my work for me.
You said I have to admit to my mistake. I have made no mistake in my interaction here.
On a better medium we can confirm the discussion we had on this thread (and others) to ensure we are both speaking honestly, and affirming the points we made previously. We can communicate more directly and respond to points in real time and avoid the confusion of whether or not I'm a bot in that moment.
Correct. And i also explicitly told you what that mistake was. Go back and read it, if you are capable.
If your intention was to derail the conversation, abandon its topic, and continue doing that ad infinitum - then i suppose that might be true. If you truly wanted to keep the conversation on topic and avoid distraction/tangent (as you claimed) then you have made nothing but mistakes since overreacting to a minor comment a dozen or so posts ago.
Pride is a fool's fortress and shame's cloak. Cast it off if you can.
That's just my point. We can't avoid that confusion. Real time bots are already capable of generating such real time content.
But as i said, it's all moot - because if you cannot remedy/avoid the bot like tendencies that are preventing the conversation from being worthwhile - then it doesn't matter what forum/medium this conversation takes place in or if your are a bot or not.
This format is vastly better for such discussions anyway. It gives you unlimited time to compose your thoughts, and to respond to specific content which you have a concrete record of (as opposed to a real time discussion in which, typically, you have neither).
And it was no mistake. My actions have been intentional and I stand by them.
My intention, currently, is to set the record straight on any further interactions we have by addressing the fact that you think I might be a bot. At this point, it can only be done through more efficient mediums.
Of course we can. Through real-time interaction through voice and/or video.
It's quite easy to research and pull up facts in real time. It's in fact very beneficial so that we can point out specific bits we want to pay more attention to, and discuss them together.