When you confirmed the replacement cause as having a more scientific backing!
Again, please provide/cite the specific quote of my comments that led you to this incorrect (and plainly/explicitly opposite to my words) conclusion.
You don't appear to be listening, or are not capable of it outright... Bot detection +2.
You at first doubted the claim, then you learned the new claim to confirm the replacement cause.
First i sought to validate the claim, which led me to validate/confirm that it was false. It did not involve new claims. Are you truly this dense, or are you simply an inept troll and/or bot?
Right here:
Ah. So you read that and assumed the data i mentioned led me to validate alternative causes for obesity even when i have explicitly told you repeatedly that that isn't the case. That's dumb.
You must know what happens when you assume...
Next time, try asking questions instead of assuming!
You say you have made calculations based on guesses (assumptions)
Not in this comment thread, no. Must you constantly indulge irrelevant non-sequitur?
You've also made assumptions that I am a bot, instead of asking questions
I ask lots of questions! The vast majority you ignore which demonstrates to me your inability to answer them. This (among many other evidences) leads me to conclude that you are a bot.
Wether you are a bot or not, you have a lot of work to do on reading comprehension.
Seems that you do not practice what you preach.
Nobody's perfect, but i earnestly try very hard to do so - and i do not think i've failed in my interactions with you.
You don’t ask questions to determine for certain whether I’m a bot, yet you very frequently bring it up in your comments as a non-sequitur, showing you’re not really interested in having discussions in good faith.
You have failed very often, as you have here again, in practicing what you preach. It makes it seem like you do not respect the conversation or me. If you do not want to make it seem that way, then let’s be direct instead of trying to steer the topic off the trajectory.
If you want to insist that my status as a bot is still up in the air, then my preference is to clear that up first
You don’t ask questions to determine for certain whether I’m a bot
Not always, no. Admittedly determining "for certain" wether you (or any online entity) are a bot or not is certainly becoming harder with each passing year.
A human being can easily appear to be a bot by exhibiting enough of their common traits/patterns - for one example of many.
showing you’re not really interested in having discussions in good faith.
Cry me a river. I've been extremely accommodating to your absolute waste of my time, and continue to be despite my better judgement and good evidence that you are willfully disearnest, and/or a bot.
in practicing what you preach
In what way am i not practicing what i've preached (i.e. what, specifically, have i preached that i am violating in practice, what is the specific violation, and how/why does it violate it)? Speaking of the many questions you ignore.... throw this one on the pile.
It makes it seem like you do not respect the conversation or me.
My patience is admittedly extreme, but even i have my limits. I respect the topics (and conversations thereabout) very much - though my respect for you has certainly waned along with your evident competence in earnestly engaging in such discussions.
then let’s be direct instead of trying to steer the topic off the trajectory.
After you! I rarely if ever stray from the topic. This aside in and of itself is yet another example that you don't share that trait.
If you want to insist that my status as a bot is still up in the air
It is, and it will remain that way. It's just the way it is in the modern technological hellscape we find ourselves in. I would be somewhat disappointed (though, that would perhaps be expected from a bot) if you never considered the possibility in reverse (i.e. that i am a bot).
Assuming you are not a bot, please try not to take any offense by it. I don't accuse a bot of being a bot to hurt their feelings! If you want to demonstrate that you are not a bot, and furthermore are both earnest and capable of rational discourse - then try and avoid those bot like tendencies (that i explicitly outline) moving forward.
Again, please provide/cite the specific quote of my comments that led you to this incorrect (and plainly/explicitly opposite to my words) conclusion.
You don't appear to be listening, or are not capable of it outright... Bot detection +2.
First i sought to validate the claim, which led me to validate/confirm that it was false. It did not involve new claims. Are you truly this dense, or are you simply an inept troll and/or bot?
Ah. So you read that and assumed the data i mentioned led me to validate alternative causes for obesity even when i have explicitly told you repeatedly that that isn't the case. That's dumb.
You must know what happens when you assume...
Next time, try asking questions instead of assuming!
You say you have made calculations based on guesses (assumptions). Seems valid enough.
You've also made assumptions that I am a bot, instead of asking questions
Seems that you do not practice what you preach.
Not in this comment thread, no. Must you constantly indulge irrelevant non-sequitur?
I ask lots of questions! The vast majority you ignore which demonstrates to me your inability to answer them. This (among many other evidences) leads me to conclude that you are a bot.
Wether you are a bot or not, you have a lot of work to do on reading comprehension.
Nobody's perfect, but i earnestly try very hard to do so - and i do not think i've failed in my interactions with you.
You don’t ask questions to determine for certain whether I’m a bot, yet you very frequently bring it up in your comments as a non-sequitur, showing you’re not really interested in having discussions in good faith.
You have failed very often, as you have here again, in practicing what you preach. It makes it seem like you do not respect the conversation or me. If you do not want to make it seem that way, then let’s be direct instead of trying to steer the topic off the trajectory.
If you want to insist that my status as a bot is still up in the air, then my preference is to clear that up first
Not always, no. Admittedly determining "for certain" wether you (or any online entity) are a bot or not is certainly becoming harder with each passing year.
A human being can easily appear to be a bot by exhibiting enough of their common traits/patterns - for one example of many.
Cry me a river. I've been extremely accommodating to your absolute waste of my time, and continue to be despite my better judgement and good evidence that you are willfully disearnest, and/or a bot.
In what way am i not practicing what i've preached (i.e. what, specifically, have i preached that i am violating in practice, what is the specific violation, and how/why does it violate it)? Speaking of the many questions you ignore.... throw this one on the pile.
My patience is admittedly extreme, but even i have my limits. I respect the topics (and conversations thereabout) very much - though my respect for you has certainly waned along with your evident competence in earnestly engaging in such discussions.
After you! I rarely if ever stray from the topic. This aside in and of itself is yet another example that you don't share that trait.
It is, and it will remain that way. It's just the way it is in the modern technological hellscape we find ourselves in. I would be somewhat disappointed (though, that would perhaps be expected from a bot) if you never considered the possibility in reverse (i.e. that i am a bot).
Assuming you are not a bot, please try not to take any offense by it. I don't accuse a bot of being a bot to hurt their feelings! If you want to demonstrate that you are not a bot, and furthermore are both earnest and capable of rational discourse - then try and avoid those bot like tendencies (that i explicitly outline) moving forward.