Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
You seem to have me confused with someone else. I am not talking about "elaborate fakes" or "conspiracies".
However, as an aside; In general - no.
Lies and fakes cost vastly less than the actual reality. Lies are cheap - as is cgi/camera tricks. Compare the cost of a model rocket to an actual one and i think you'll find "faking" is vastly more cost effective.
Well there is funding that goes to education facilities to teach this, science shows, lectures, maps, all sorts of things produced that support the globe earth. Why is this cheaper than the truth?
Well there is funding that goes to education facilities to teach this, science shows, lectures, maps, all sorts of things produced that support the globe earth
None of those things support (or depend on) a globe earth, no. The shape of the world simply is - it requires no support whatsoever regardless of what that shape is.
Educational funding happens for an entirely different purpose.
Why is this cheaper than the truth?
Truth is ALWAYS more valuable/expensive than lies. It's a truism.
But HOW is it more expensive? With so much funding going towards educating the public on a globe earth, how is the truth more costly? What more is at stake? Would it not be cheaper to just educate people on the truth?
Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
You seem to have me confused with someone else. I am not talking about "elaborate fakes" or "conspiracies".
However, as an aside; In general - no.
Lies and fakes cost vastly less than the actual reality. Lies are cheap - as is cgi/camera tricks. Compare the cost of a model rocket to an actual one and i think you'll find "faking" is vastly more cost effective.
Well there is funding that goes to education facilities to teach this, science shows, lectures, maps, all sorts of things produced that support the globe earth. Why is this cheaper than the truth?
None of those things support (or depend on) a globe earth, no. The shape of the world simply is - it requires no support whatsoever regardless of what that shape is.
Educational funding happens for an entirely different purpose.
Truth is ALWAYS more valuable/expensive than lies. It's a truism.
But HOW is it more expensive? With so much funding going towards educating the public on a globe earth, how is the truth more costly? What more is at stake? Would it not be cheaper to just educate people on the truth?