Look at the reports about 5G interfering with airplane landing equipment. The US implemented 5G entirely different than the UK. Less buffer space, and higher output. Your question is worded in a way that won't get results.
Look at why the FAA had to fight the carrier companies over this ( above summary).
Without our money they would not be able to sustain their expansion.
If we all opted for the slowest fixed Internet possible and ditched mobile data all together we would be carrying out massive economic setback because they would then have to be subsidised by the governments for a service the people do not use.
When I see zoomers and millenials I wish to crush their heads to a pulp
Technology is the application of science. There are old Ma Bell reports on the dangers of 5G ( the OG G conspiracy) which are absolutely still valid today because frequency, and wave length do not change. A summary of the danger is that 5G being too close in seize t human internal organs means it's too easily absorbed by the human body. Health problems were detailed.
I listed to parts of this report read aloud years ago. I think it was on Fade 2 Black, but I'm not sure. I was able to find and read the entire report at that time. If you have difficulty, ask a librarian. You may need to be logged in as paying for a journal.
Example :the wavelengths of the visible color spectrum don't change, the difference with sound is simply it's both, and paid for which means they're monitizing it how they chose.
Don't forget the US is using the word 5G while implementing the cellular rowers entirely different than the UK. This is the issue with planes not being able to see the ground. These articles have been posted.
Look at the reports about 5G interfering with airplane landing equipment. The US implemented 5G entirely different than the UK. Less buffer space, and higher output. Your question is worded in a way that won't get results.
Look at why the FAA had to fight the carrier companies over this ( above summary).
this?
apparently I should be looking for C-band?
https://www.rcrwireless.com/20221027/5g/faa-to-fcc-mandate-5g-c-band-usage-around-airports
Some of these articles referenced a report that they either lied, or they didn't understand what they read when they cited it. Physics doesn't change.
Ultimately fren it is us who fund those fuckers.
Without our money they would not be able to sustain their expansion.
If we all opted for the slowest fixed Internet possible and ditched mobile data all together we would be carrying out massive economic setback because they would then have to be subsidised by the governments for a service the people do not use.
When I see zoomers and millenials I wish to crush their heads to a pulp
Technology is the application of science. There are old Ma Bell reports on the dangers of 5G ( the OG G conspiracy) which are absolutely still valid today because frequency, and wave length do not change. A summary of the danger is that 5G being too close in seize t human internal organs means it's too easily absorbed by the human body. Health problems were detailed.
I listed to parts of this report read aloud years ago. I think it was on Fade 2 Black, but I'm not sure. I was able to find and read the entire report at that time. If you have difficulty, ask a librarian. You may need to be logged in as paying for a journal.
I also found this https://opencellid.org/ but as far as I know LTE equals 4G
LTE / LTE+ is branding.
Example :the wavelengths of the visible color spectrum don't change, the difference with sound is simply it's both, and paid for which means they're monitizing it how they chose.
Don't forget the US is using the word 5G while implementing the cellular rowers entirely different than the UK. This is the issue with planes not being able to see the ground. These articles have been posted.
They have pcb/chips that have the name covid on it. Just a coincidence