We’re on the border of the Luciferian New World Order - Conspiracies

We’re on the border of the Luciferian New World Order (pomf2.lain.la)

posted 1 year ago by Third-Eye-Vision 1 year ago by Third-Eye-Vision +7 / -3

5 comments

5 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (5)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Third-Eye-Vision [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

a) LUCID (shine; light) + FERO (wild)

a) Lucifer is the word meaning 'light bearer' (from lux, lucis, "light", and ferre, "to bear, bring"), a Roman astrological term for the "Morning Star" the planet Venus. The word Lucifer was the translation of the Septuagint Greek heosphoros, ("dawn-bearer"; cf. Greek phosphoros, "light-bearer"; itself the translation of the Hebrew Helel ben Shahar, Son of Dawn), used by Jerome in the Vulgate, having mythologically the same meaning as Prometheus who brought fire to humanity.

b) white (pure light) and black (absence of light) imply borders for those running wild withing the spectrum of visible light.

b) One form of phosphorus (white phosphorus) emits a faint glow upon exposure to oxygen (hence its Greek derivation and the Latin 'light-bearer', meaning the planet Venus as Hesperus or "Morning Star").

c) consenting to suggested the-ism keeps one in the dark, hence ignoring BRIGHT, adjective (Heb. to shine) - "evident; clear; manifest to the mind, as light is to the eyes".

c) Luciferianism is often identified as an auxiliary of Satanism, due to the popular identification of Lucifer with Satan. Some Luciferians accept this identification or consider Lucifer as the light bearer aspect of Satan, or even as equivalent to Satan, and thus could properly be called Theistic Satanists. Others reject it, arguing that Lucifer is a more positive ideal than Satan. They are inspired by the ancient myths of Egypt, Rome and Greece, Gnosticism and/or traditional Western occultism.

TLDR: Dark (Satan) or false light (lucifer) on the checkered masonic floor, representing black or white magick, aka left or right hand paths. Reality is that God's light can't exist in evil devil worshipers.

For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed. John 3:20

https://www.detoxorcist.com/historical-pagan-deities-satanic-archetypes.html

http://www.whale.to/b/lucifer.html

http://www.whale.to/c/lucifer_the_light_bearer.html

http://www.whale.to/c/luciferian_report.html

http://www.whale.to/c/hesperus.html

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Theistic Satanists...Lucifer is the word meaning 'light bearer"

a) Notice usage of "THE word" aka placing the-ism before suggested (word), which tempts one to ignore perceivable (sound).

b) if words have meaning, then what about letters? Who LETS others define meaning of suggested words?

c) if letters implies suggested symbolism, then what about perceivable symmetry?

d) what if bearer (form) and light (flow) are distinct from one another, while simultaneously same aka partials (form) within whole (flow)?

e) -ist (satanist) implies ones consent to follow suggested -ism (satanism). Does being (life) need to follow origin (inception towards death) or does it need to resist the temptation thereof?

What if the path of least resistance implies ones choice to ignore resisting?

f) What about satan aka adversary aka adverse (opposite)? Could there be opposition without conflict? Does resistance (life) oppose velocity (inception towards death)? What if resistance could be tempted into a conflict against other resistance by ignoring to resist velocity?

Greek phosphoros, "light-bearer"

Light "bringer". White (pure) phosphorus (light bringer) implies motion (light) generating momentum (spectrum) for bearers of light within the visible light-spectrum. Those bearers of light imply hue (color) man, which are emitting (inception) rays; radius; races (life) towards absence of light (death).

of dawn

DAWN, verb - "to begin to grow"...only within ongoing can temporary (life) begin (inception) and end (death).

Suggested "from dusk till dawn" represents the inversion of perceivable from dawn (inception) till (life) dusk (death).

identified; identification

Suggested IDEN'TICAL, adjective (Latin idem, the same) represents the inversion of perceivable differentiation. To be implies one apart from one another, hence differentiated (life) within momentum (inception toward death) of same motion.

Whatever one perceives exists at a "different" position than ones perception. Awareness implies one being aware of something else. Whole differentiates itself into partials, which partials perceive as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for the sustenance of oneself as apartheid within wholeness.

Perpetuation of oneself implies through intercourse with another one for OFF-spring, hence perpetuation through differentiation.

This 1 and this 1 are not the same, they are ten spaces apart from one another, hence existing at different position. It's the suggestion of look-a-likes which tempts one to believe in sameness.

Light implies sameness; being within the visible spectrum of light implies differentiation of solids (light-bearer) within fluid (light-bringer).

permalink parent save report block reply