It was a vehicle designed for a low-gravity environment; they look flimsy but are heavily engineered to work well. You're belittling enormous engineering effort. Fucking talentless retard.
Not really. It is just that I have no tolerance for morons whether they are in engineering or especially in politics. As for your comment that I'm not an engineer but a shill, it's invalid - I'm a good quality engineer and for that matter, a scientist and I'll take on any challengers any time. And I enjoyed working at JPL on space things, and gained a lot of knowledge about the things we put in space. So I don't take it lightly when dumb people like the op mock genuine engineering.
People forget that gravity on the moon is far lower than earth normal. This means you do not have to build a spacecraft out of Arnold Schwarzenger's bones - the structural members need only be 1/5 as strong an earth craft would need. Thus the lunar lander looks flimsy but is quite suited for the moon.
It was a vehicle designed for a low-gravity environment; they look flimsy but are heavily engineered to work well. You're belittling enormous engineering effort. Fucking talentless retard.
You seem like an angry person...
Not really. It is just that I have no tolerance for morons whether they are in engineering or especially in politics. As for your comment that I'm not an engineer but a shill, it's invalid - I'm a good quality engineer and for that matter, a scientist and I'll take on any challengers any time. And I enjoyed working at JPL on space things, and gained a lot of knowledge about the things we put in space. So I don't take it lightly when dumb people like the op mock genuine engineering. People forget that gravity on the moon is far lower than earth normal. This means you do not have to build a spacecraft out of Arnold Schwarzenger's bones - the structural members need only be 1/5 as strong an earth craft would need. Thus the lunar lander looks flimsy but is quite suited for the moon.