posted ago by LeoLittlebook ago by LeoLittlebook +5 / -3

If you think remote viewing is inaccurate, look at Farsight's conclusions for events you know about, such as the Kennedy assassination. They found he was assassinated by the US government, which then covered it up. Ask yourself why these hippies are getting such based answers to their cosmic inquiries. The simple answer is that remote viewing works, for past and (variable) futures. With caveats: viewer must be open to the truth, blind protocols reduce bias, and multiple viewers are required to filter noise and distinguish alternative realities from our own.

Farsight's latest bombshell is that top right-wing Israeli leadership foreknew and funded the Hamas Oct 7 attack:

Mossad and Netanyahu developed Hamas threat and permitted Oct 7 attack to provoke lucrative war, Farsight remote viewers confirm. | YouTube

It's a 30 minute video, but you might want to read my summary first. The video format is counterintuitive due to Farsight's blind protocols. The remote viewer (RVer) doesn't know what her topic is; she's just given a coded prompt. She presents her data, and then her manager reveals the topic to her. Her surprise is obviously genuine. Her presentation is done blind so that her biases don't influence her report.

If you've never watched a Farsight video before, it makes for a somewhat confusing experience, since she literally has no idea what she's talking about. I recommend using closed captions and the transcript.

The video begins with the manager's topic introduction. Unlike a "false flag", a "green flag" operation is an enemy attack that is engineered or allowed to happen, such as Roosevelt inviting Pearl Harbor or Bismarck baiting Napoleon.

The manager is hinting at the conclusion: The Hamas October 7 "surprise" attack on Israel was foreknown by Israel's chief of Mossad and Netanyahu. In fact, Israel has funded Hamas for years to prevent a peaceful two-state solution, because it would dangerously shrink Israel's territory.

Next the RVer presents her report. First she views the thoughts of Netanyahu and Mossad two days before the Hamas attack, on October 5.

The RVer sees that David Barnea (chief of Mossad) foreknew that the attack was coming. Barnea's goals for the attack were financial gain and starting a war. He also must appease certain shadowy elites to whom he's beholden.

The Hamas attack was staged or manipulated. Barnea feels like a puppeteer, but is also a puppet.

The RVer sees that Netanyahu also foreknew the Oct 7 Hamas attack. He spent lots of money and energy on it. Netanyahu has witnessed the Hamas terrorist threat be manufactured over time.

Netanyahu has mixed feelings on the attack: regret but acceptance of its necessity.

Netanyahu feels someone has an angle of power on him. He is focused on a political contest (rival politicians).

Next the RVer shifts to examining the two men on October 7, during the Hamas attack.

Barnea hoped he'd done enough. He was depending on a small group. He was frantic and angry.

Netanyahu was similar. He felt a need to sabotage someone to save himself.

The rest of the video is mostly just the RVer being shocked, confused and appalled, and the manager explaining to her that this is how the world works. Mossad's dreams of money were realized immediately via US aid. Netanyahu's waning popularity was saved, corruption scandals forgotten.

I wonder who the Mossad chief's shadowy handlers are. The Rothschilds, perhaps? One doubts even Farsight will go there.

Other sources independently confirm Farsight's cynical revelations:

One likely goal of the Greater Israel project is to compete with (or destroy) the Suez Canal by digging one through the Negev Desert on the other side of the Sinai Peninsula:

The Palestinian Gaza Strip blocks or threatens this canal.

Obviously such plans imply the use of nuclear weapons, as little else could permanently disable the Suez. Using its nuclear arsenal is the only way Israel can realistically hope to survive a pan-Islamic jihad supported by Russo-China and fought by Muslim soldiers seasoned by Iraq and Afghanistan. These jihadis have learned how to bankrupt a technologically superior but casualty-averse adversary, and Israel has already suffered catastrophic economic harm.

The Jerusalem Post
@Jerusalem​_Post

A junior Israeli officer in the elite 8200 intelligence unit warned over Hamas's plan of a mass infiltration event and was ignored by her commanders and threatened with court martial.

#Israel | #IDF | #October7massacre

IDF elite intel officer warned about Hamas attacks, ignored - report | Jerusalem Post

Israel and America's Growing Zugzwang | Simplicius

Israel backed Hamas to prevent a two-state solution, thereby provoking pan-Islamic jihad against Israel and the USA. | Frank Wright

For further discussion, continue reading here.