Personally, I've tentatively adopted the thesis behind Rand Flem-Ath's work: that Antarctica was the site of Atlantis. That is to say the capital, although I also think we're being misdirected by Jimmy Corsetti and the like with subsidiary locations of the same global empire.
I've never actually read Flem-Ath's books, just heard a couple of interviews. Never saw the point in gathering more evidence because almost every single person interested in the subject is, in the end, only interested in what they have already concluded, and only in evidence that supports it.
That's a general principle but is especially pronounced when it comes to Atlantis.
The suggested cover stories by others can only work with a consenting ones ignorance (cover) and within ones memory (store).
transparent
PA'RENT, noun (Latin parens, from pario, to produce or bring forth)...inception towards death produces/brings forth trans-muted life.
Being implies trans (temporary ingredient) within parent (ongoing base)...the less one stores suggested stories by others; the more previously ignored one uncovers.
From a different perspective...being hue (color) man in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light) implies TRANSPA'RENCY, noun - "state of a body by which it suffers rays of light to pass through it".
Being implies radiation (growth) within light (loss); hence radiate; raddix; ray; race, hence "human race" aka hue-man radiation.
a) bear/born aka bearing (inception towards death) witness (life) aka even (loss) bearing odds (growth) aka whole (perceivable) bearing partials (perception).
b) against aka again aka frequent repetition of witnessing choice within bearing balance.
The issue with figuring this out by oneself is that ones consent to a suggestion (antarctica) by another implies forfeiture of witness testimony (test in one) aka TEST; verb (Latin testor) - "to make a will".
One cannot choose from another ones choice (aka from a chosen one) without ignoring ones own choice in the process. Ones ignorance prevents ones sight.
The words you read are designed to distract you from the behavior of partials (instructed minds aka instru-ments) moving within sound aka SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire". Being alive implies in-sanus (within sound) per-sonos (by sound)...others suggest "insane person" to distract one from discerning that. That represents spell-craft and your consent to suggested words permits others to put a spell on you.
The more one resists words, the more one opens up to sound, and the more one teaches self to learn about behavior of sound, the more one discerns self as being (life) within having (inception towards death) aka "be-have".
Others suggest one "to behave" as the inversion of "having to be"...the former tempts one to follow orders; while the latter inspires one to resist natural order.
Each suggested word represents an inversion of perceivable sound..the former is affixed by ones consent to definitions, while the latter moves and can't be held onto.
Words are shaped out of "letters"...ones consent to suggested words "lets" others shape them.
LET, verb (Latin elocare, to lease) - "to permit; to allow; to suffer; to withhold restraint; not to prevent"...one needs to resist letting others choose wants or not wants for self.
Personally, I've tentatively adopted the thesis behind Rand Flem-Ath's work: that Antarctica was the site of Atlantis. That is to say the capital, although I also think we're being misdirected by Jimmy Corsetti and the like with subsidiary locations of the same global empire.
I've never actually read Flem-Ath's books, just heard a couple of interviews. Never saw the point in gathering more evidence because almost every single person interested in the subject is, in the end, only interested in what they have already concluded, and only in evidence that supports it.
That's a general principle but is especially pronounced when it comes to Atlantis.
The few suggest fascism; communism, capitalism AND nationalism; while the many consent by choosing a side within.
a) ANT (anti; against) ARKTOS (bear).
b) https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bear
The suggested cover stories by others can only work with a consenting ones ignorance (cover) and within ones memory (store).
PA'RENT, noun (Latin parens, from pario, to produce or bring forth)...inception towards death produces/brings forth trans-muted life.
Being implies trans (temporary ingredient) within parent (ongoing base)...the less one stores suggested stories by others; the more previously ignored one uncovers.
From a different perspective...being hue (color) man in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light) implies TRANSPA'RENCY, noun - "state of a body by which it suffers rays of light to pass through it".
Being implies radiation (growth) within light (loss); hence radiate; raddix; ray; race, hence "human race" aka hue-man radiation.
This part though. What's up with this odd shit?
a) bear/born aka bearing (inception towards death) witness (life) aka even (loss) bearing odds (growth) aka whole (perceivable) bearing partials (perception).
b) against aka again aka frequent repetition of witnessing choice within bearing balance.
The issue with figuring this out by oneself is that ones consent to a suggestion (antarctica) by another implies forfeiture of witness testimony (test in one) aka TEST; verb (Latin testor) - "to make a will".
One cannot choose from another ones choice (aka from a chosen one) without ignoring ones own choice in the process. Ones ignorance prevents ones sight.
The words you read are designed to distract you from the behavior of partials (instructed minds aka instru-ments) moving within sound aka SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire". Being alive implies in-sanus (within sound) per-sonos (by sound)...others suggest "insane person" to distract one from discerning that. That represents spell-craft and your consent to suggested words permits others to put a spell on you.
The more one resists words, the more one opens up to sound, and the more one teaches self to learn about behavior of sound, the more one discerns self as being (life) within having (inception towards death) aka "be-have".
Others suggest one "to behave" as the inversion of "having to be"...the former tempts one to follow orders; while the latter inspires one to resist natural order.
Each suggested word represents an inversion of perceivable sound..the former is affixed by ones consent to definitions, while the latter moves and can't be held onto.
Words are shaped out of "letters"...ones consent to suggested words "lets" others shape them.
LET, verb (Latin elocare, to lease) - "to permit; to allow; to suffer; to withhold restraint; not to prevent"...one needs to resist letting others choose wants or not wants for self.