To substantiate the capability in your title, using the links you've provided (and surely read through thoroughly yourself), I'm sure you can easily answer the question:
You lack integrity and credibility if you can't explain the thing you're sharing and asserting as a fact. It puts you from "JFK back of head blown off from behind him?" to "Flat Urf is a level plane and the ice wall will consume us all!" real fuckin quick.
And the "You must be the opposite of everything me and the boys here hold dear, right fellas?" rant doesn't help matters either, dude.
If you want to dismiss the findings because I posted MSM science articles calling it an "observatory", well that's fine too.
Lol, that's a convenient backhand you cooked up. I think I'm the one on the side of that, so the onus is on you to show how it's more than an observatory.
"Capable of generating earthquakes" is what you said.
I asked how.
This has been a whole lot of red yarn pinned up in order to avoid even beginning to venture down that path.
Surely something like you suggest requires a lot of power in order to accomplish it. Which part of this image do you think makes all that power?
I'm not saying "nope can't happen", which is yet another convenient deke on your end, no what I am saying is "Show us what 'your research' is good for. What has it even taught you?"
Like, fuck sakes dude, saying buzzword shit like "occult" and "skunk works" and "black budget" couldn't be any more of a canned response, to use your term, as though the mere utterance of them in relation is what grants your conclusions the right to connect them.
It's absurd and shows zero rational discernment. Just the same old specious nonsense one would find with the other goofball nonsense conspiracy theories.
Which this definitely looks like.
Can't benign science exist in your world? Does everything need to have a sinister overlord attached to it?
No, the entire story prefaces that the facility is on the south pole of a globe. This is where most people who think they are smart get lost when trying to understand what is real and fake
I saw a theory a while back claiming it was a worldwide surveillence system. They said it pulsed out ELF waves and had a super computer reassemble the "doppler" image into live video. This provided a 3d view of anywhere on earth. It kept archives as well, so TPTB could rewind any event anywhere in the world and review it as if they were there. They claimed it was possible due to the immense processing power of quantum computers.
Kind of a crazy theory, but I found it entertaining.
I remember reading several accounts of time cameras, starting all the way back in the early 1900s. They claimed using a quartz crystal lens made it so they could view events in the past. Somebody discovered it again in the 50s supposedly, and it was once again confiscated by the authorities.
It made me wonder if all electromagnetic waves, even light, has a half-life, and much like our ability to view radiation signatures long after a radioactive object moves, if you had the right kind of lens it would be able to view the half-life of light waves.
That kind of technology would be a dealbreaker for the powers that be. Things like Kennedy's assassination would be solved by simply going to the location of the assassination and viewing the area with a time camera.
Back in the early 2000s I tried to get a quartz crystal lens for my canon camera, but the only place I could find that sold them required you to submit a reason for the request. I never did get around to digging into that subject to find out if that was just a fluke.
To substantiate the capability in your title, using the links you've provided (and surely read through thoroughly yourself), I'm sure you can easily answer the question:
How?
Clearly the answer if Fuck Tha Police.
Coming straight from tha underground
A young neutrigga got it bad cause I'm theoretically massless
Fuck that shit, cause I ain't the one. For a punk ass to tell me if I'm a wave or particle.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/HAARP
Haarp is a transmitter. This ice cube is a receiver.
Yes, the question is still how.
Be more sensible and less sensational. That's how shinfo perpetuates.
You lack integrity and credibility if you can't explain the thing you're sharing and asserting as a fact. It puts you from "JFK back of head blown off from behind him?" to "Flat Urf is a level plane and the ice wall will consume us all!" real fuckin quick.
And the "You must be the opposite of everything me and the boys here hold dear, right fellas?" rant doesn't help matters either, dude.
Lol, that's a convenient backhand you cooked up. I think I'm the one on the side of that, so the onus is on you to show how it's more than an observatory. "Capable of generating earthquakes" is what you said.
I asked how.
This has been a whole lot of red yarn pinned up in order to avoid even beginning to venture down that path. Surely something like you suggest requires a lot of power in order to accomplish it. Which part of this image do you think makes all that power?
I'm not saying "nope can't happen", which is yet another convenient deke on your end, no what I am saying is "Show us what 'your research' is good for. What has it even taught you?"
Like, fuck sakes dude, saying buzzword shit like "occult" and "skunk works" and "black budget" couldn't be any more of a canned response, to use your term, as though the mere utterance of them in relation is what grants your conclusions the right to connect them.
It's absurd and shows zero rational discernment. Just the same old specious nonsense one would find with the other goofball nonsense conspiracy theories.
Which this definitely looks like.
Can't benign science exist in your world? Does everything need to have a sinister overlord attached to it?
It's bullshit. You know that, right?
No, the entire story prefaces that the facility is on the south pole of a globe. This is where most people who think they are smart get lost when trying to understand what is real and fake
When they announced the construction of that thing and said it was going to be to detect neutrinos, I laughed cynically. Just like CERN.
What? No one says that
Nope
I looked again. There is Antarctica going around all the other continents.
I saw a theory a while back claiming it was a worldwide surveillence system. They said it pulsed out ELF waves and had a super computer reassemble the "doppler" image into live video. This provided a 3d view of anywhere on earth. It kept archives as well, so TPTB could rewind any event anywhere in the world and review it as if they were there. They claimed it was possible due to the immense processing power of quantum computers.
Kind of a crazy theory, but I found it entertaining.
I remember reading several accounts of time cameras, starting all the way back in the early 1900s. They claimed using a quartz crystal lens made it so they could view events in the past. Somebody discovered it again in the 50s supposedly, and it was once again confiscated by the authorities.
It made me wonder if all electromagnetic waves, even light, has a half-life, and much like our ability to view radiation signatures long after a radioactive object moves, if you had the right kind of lens it would be able to view the half-life of light waves.
That kind of technology would be a dealbreaker for the powers that be. Things like Kennedy's assassination would be solved by simply going to the location of the assassination and viewing the area with a time camera.
Back in the early 2000s I tried to get a quartz crystal lens for my canon camera, but the only place I could find that sold them required you to submit a reason for the request. I never did get around to digging into that subject to find out if that was just a fluke.