Why do you think it's not? Between the 2 possibilities, A) a highly experimental bioengineering concoction was given to pregnant women and nothing happened, B) a highly experimental bioengineering concoction was given to pregnant women and there were some problems, you think A is more likely than B? That the manufacturers are not legally obligated to disclose all ingredients, nor all research information for 70 years, nor are they liable for any adverse effects, you don't think that's suspicious at all? That U.Sm citizens were denied life saving operations without having all X boosters but illegal immigrants weren't required to get any injections to receive care, you don't find that suspicious at all? I'm not saying I'm magically omnipotent and have all the answes but surely you can't expect to just reference an "article" from a nation with a comical level of internal propaganda and expect people to not be suspicious here?