If you know the history of the Bible being an anthology, then his focus makes perfect sense. He never said the original was bad. He just sorted all the Jesus in the same way we do with digital Bibles today. He was ahead of his time.
How do you study Jesus? You avoided to say directly whether you've read the Bible... While promoting your nonsense version... :D Strike 1.
You told me I read fiction, when you are reading a fake Bible, written by a known liar... :D Strike 2.
Not only you are projecting, but you are clearly delusional, mentally challenged, and possibly very violent person. I said you've never read the Bible, because it shows, and you errupted like an exposed Ben Shapiro... :D Strike 3. You're out!
Only j3wz think that way about Jesus.
They don't even believe in him.
The Thomas Jefferson Bible has a focus on Jesus.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible#:~:text=Jefferson's%20condensed%20composition%20excludes%20all,that%20portray%20Jesus%20as%20divine.
Apparently the wrong focus. If he was excluding stuff from the Bible... then it's quite clear.
If you know the history of the Bible being an anthology, then his focus makes perfect sense. He never said the original was bad. He just sorted all the Jesus in the same way we do with digital Bibles today. He was ahead of his time.
You clearly never read the Bible.
You clearly like fan fiction.
Sorry a book scares you.
Now you're projecting. You're the one afraid of someone's efforts to study Jesus.
How do you study Jesus? You avoided to say directly whether you've read the Bible... While promoting your nonsense version... :D Strike 1.
You told me I read fiction, when you are reading a fake Bible, written by a known liar... :D Strike 2.
Not only you are projecting, but you are clearly delusional, mentally challenged, and possibly very violent person. I said you've never read the Bible, because it shows, and you errupted like an exposed Ben Shapiro... :D Strike 3. You're out!