Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

7
()
posted 2 years ago by XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 years ago by XxxRDTPRNxxX +11 / -5
38 comments share
38 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

You do if you want to claim this photo supports a flat earth

You've already forgotten what we were talking about? That's a little sad :(

No one claimed any photo you shared supports a flat earth. Perhaps you need to go back and re-read in order to remember what we were talking about.

Especially after spending an entire day telling me how invalid this photo is as evidence due to distortion

I appreciate that is all you experienced / can remember - but i never said anything of the sort. I never said the photos you shared were invalid, and it didn't take me more than a single comment (a sentence or two, actually) to explain why the photos do not and cannot show the curvature of the earth. The "entire day", continuing into today - has only been to try and help you to understand those few sentences.

Also, you need to measure the distortion too, not just the distance in the photo.

Again, i'm not the one who is confused about the globe model or the extremely subtle (essentially imperceptible) curvature that is described in it and would be (by calculation) visible on such scales.

If the reason for the ostensible curvature is not due to distortion, which i agree is the presumptive/deductive cause, then what on earth do you think causes it? Do you truly believe the world is far tinier than the globe model describes / we're taught? I am having difficulty imagining another option.

I'm not wasting my time on any more novels from you

They are only a waste if you don't read and/or understand them. When you don't understand, the best thing to begin with is to ask questions!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy