sure I agree but this guy with over 10k subs on Odysee has the name Truth Above ALl and he keeps posting these videos. I explained that these points are wrong over and over but he's lost in this cult and funny how all his followers love this shit and he gets 99% upvotes on flat earth videos.
If it were, hardly anyone would know that - because virtually no one bothers to actually study/research it. They just "know because teacher told them so", and faithfully repeat as they are required to for matriculation.
It was proven over and over
So people believe, yet if they are asked "When, by whom, and by what specific procedure" they find they can't answer that simple question. Worse, those few that can answer (or rather, believe, they have the correct answer) parrot conditioned (by rote under the guise of education) responses which are plainly wrong - like eratosthenes and columbus (neither of which set out to prove the shape of the world in any way shape or form; they were taught it was spherical from childhood, just like us today, and never once doubted that or set out to prove it true).
This in and of itself is immensely fascinating to the earnest student. The actual shape of the world, is much less so.
Am i wrong in thinking that you posted this video because you were earnestly interested in the topic and/or content of the video? Even if that interest is purely critical/dismissive/mocking - that is still genuine interest in my book.
but it was debunked by Mark Passio and it's a known PSYop and it goes against the Law of correspondence, as below so above. below is round (atoms, molecules) so the above HAS TO BE ROUND.
Debunking is for and by idiots. Capable students striving for objectivity prefer earnest and diligent research instead. Of course, that research can involve refutation of various claims.
and it's a known PSYop
Of that i have little doubt. Most flat earth videos are products of the heavily advertised (i.e. heavily funded) flat earth psyop.
against the Law of correspondence, as below so above.
Is that a law? It is certainly an alchemical principle, and echoed (if not straight repeated) in the bohr model.
Even if it were a law, if the earth were flat would that mean that matter couldn't be spherical (or any of the other platonic shapes)? Conversely, if it were spherical would that mean that other shapes (on the micro or macro scale) wouldn't/couldn't exist? More exists in heaven and earth than exists in all our philosophies combined.
Thanks for reposting! I'll check it out - i've never heard of this guy.
I agree. that's what he says as well, go and test for yourself and find objective proof.
Yes it is a law. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASUHN3gNxWo
go and do your homework if you didn't. this is the MOST IMPORTANT HOMEWORK in aaallllllll conspiracies.
yes that is what it means, it's the principle of correspondence and it should apply on all realms including phisical.
if you don't know about this guy, Mark, then consider looking into his seminars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX450kAQhWo&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb83lZgEA3nALsDM1QogyvC0
he is an ex satanic priest put in Rank by Lavey himself. who switched sides and tries to help humanity for over a decade. he put out so much info and even taught people the trivium method, how to know the truth. also he urges people to think for themselves.
The Earth isn’t flat. There’s nothing to think.
sure I agree but this guy with over 10k subs on Odysee has the name Truth Above ALl and he keeps posting these videos. I explained that these points are wrong over and over but he's lost in this cult and funny how all his followers love this shit and he gets 99% upvotes on flat earth videos.
the lies above all
Deleted :( Could you repost the video link?
If you have genuine interest in the subject (including critical/negative) please join on c/flatearthresearch to discuss and exchange views.
NO. the flat earth isn't flat. It was proven over and over.
https://odysee.com/@januszkowalskii1979:e/Globe-Earth-vs-Flat-Earth---30-Flat-Earth-Fallacies-and-Sphere-Earth-Sophistry:d?lc=585d384a59c3cc353f4ef6ba541ccfb7b42ce4f2f14cb800c3563d6fce4ff4fb
deleted link. which is bs for retards who can't see the truth.
If it were, hardly anyone would know that - because virtually no one bothers to actually study/research it. They just "know because teacher told them so", and faithfully repeat as they are required to for matriculation.
So people believe, yet if they are asked "When, by whom, and by what specific procedure" they find they can't answer that simple question. Worse, those few that can answer (or rather, believe, they have the correct answer) parrot conditioned (by rote under the guise of education) responses which are plainly wrong - like eratosthenes and columbus (neither of which set out to prove the shape of the world in any way shape or form; they were taught it was spherical from childhood, just like us today, and never once doubted that or set out to prove it true).
This in and of itself is immensely fascinating to the earnest student. The actual shape of the world, is much less so.
Am i wrong in thinking that you posted this video because you were earnestly interested in the topic and/or content of the video? Even if that interest is purely critical/dismissive/mocking - that is still genuine interest in my book.
if you want I can link it.
but it was debunked by Mark Passio and it's a known PSYop and it goes against the Law of correspondence, as below so above. below is round (atoms, molecules) so the above HAS TO BE ROUND.
https://odysee.com/@Soren:71/Mark_Passio-Psy_Ops:0
1:33:55
Debunking is for and by idiots. Capable students striving for objectivity prefer earnest and diligent research instead. Of course, that research can involve refutation of various claims.
Of that i have little doubt. Most flat earth videos are products of the heavily advertised (i.e. heavily funded) flat earth psyop.
Is that a law? It is certainly an alchemical principle, and echoed (if not straight repeated) in the bohr model.
Even if it were a law, if the earth were flat would that mean that matter couldn't be spherical (or any of the other platonic shapes)? Conversely, if it were spherical would that mean that other shapes (on the micro or macro scale) wouldn't/couldn't exist? More exists in heaven and earth than exists in all our philosophies combined.
Thanks for reposting! I'll check it out - i've never heard of this guy.
I agree. that's what he says as well, go and test for yourself and find objective proof. Yes it is a law. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASUHN3gNxWo go and do your homework if you didn't. this is the MOST IMPORTANT HOMEWORK in aaallllllll conspiracies. yes that is what it means, it's the principle of correspondence and it should apply on all realms including phisical. if you don't know about this guy, Mark, then consider looking into his seminars. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX450kAQhWo&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb83lZgEA3nALsDM1QogyvC0
he is an ex satanic priest put in Rank by Lavey himself. who switched sides and tries to help humanity for over a decade. he put out so much info and even taught people the trivium method, how to know the truth. also he urges people to think for themselves.
https://odysee.com/@Soren:71/Mark-Passio---How-to-resist-vaccine-mandates-(intense)):4
also him. open the full link. and consider taking the time over the next months to watch into his work, you will learn so much