I should correct you: this is not what my stance is. Please read carefully. There are plenty of different forces that do not push.
Pushing force, however, must always come from behind. That is the very definition of pushing. If we want to have a clear discussion, we should understand that words have meaning, and use them carefully.
I did not mean to mischaracterize your position, apologies for leaving out the qualifier "pushing" (i said "force" instead of "pushing force"). A freudian slip, as it is my view (and that of classical physics) that there is no other type of force.
we should understand that words have meaning, and use them carefully.
Agreed, though earnest mistakes are made (both in speaking and in receiving/interpreting what was said).
Speaking of which, did you understand my previous comment and/or have any response to it?
I should correct you: this is not what my stance is. Please read carefully. There are plenty of different forces that do not push.
Pushing force, however, must always come from behind. That is the very definition of pushing. If we want to have a clear discussion, we should understand that words have meaning, and use them carefully.
I did not mean to mischaracterize your position, apologies for leaving out the qualifier "pushing" (i said "force" instead of "pushing force"). A freudian slip, as it is my view (and that of classical physics) that there is no other type of force.
Agreed, though earnest mistakes are made (both in speaking and in receiving/interpreting what was said).
Speaking of which, did you understand my previous comment and/or have any response to it?