From the intrinsic property of matter called weight, and the interplay between the weight of an object and the weight of the media it displaces.
Does it come from the earth, pulling stuff downward towards it?
No. In fact, in classical physics there is no mechanism for pulling at all. Everything is push. A common example is sucking up liquid in a straw - you think you are pulling the liquid up to your mouth - but actually it is the air (and its weight!) which is pushing the liquid up.
Pushing stuff towards earth? If so, where?
Yes. From the weight within, surrounding, and above the object
Why don't objects with "weight" just displace east to west?
Why should they? The general reason is because they have no imbalance in that axis/dimension to resolve. The force from the displaced media's weight is roughly equivalent on all sides, and the weight of the object seeks equilibrium (down, where - generally speaking - it came from).
Why is it always in the same direction relative to the earth?
Well, technically it isn't. But it is mostly the same direction because that is the direction of least resistance to reach equilibrium. All things tend towards rest.
Things fall because they are lifted (and with the energy used to lift them), and because the media which they sit upon cannot support their weight.
Because there's no force being imparted on them to pull them downward in your worldview.
That is not a sensical answer to my question. If there is no force being imparted on them (other than the intrinsic force of weight and the interplay of that weight and the weight of the media displaced), why should they go east or west?
Gravity accounts for this
Gravitation. And, no - gravitation can't account for anything if it isn't real. I appreciate that in imagination it appears to account for it, but in reality it doesn't and the phenomenon of falling is still caused by weight. Even if gravitation were real, not all things fall, and archimedes had figured out and formally described why millennia ago (almost 2 millennia before the fiction of gravitation was first invoked by newton purely to solve an astronomical math problem).
The cause is made clear in the equation. Weight is all there is, and all that is needed.
I honestly don't know what to say to that other than it's word salad
When you don't understand, the best thing to begin with is to ask questions! The more specific the question the more likely you are to get a specific answer you're seeking.
Throwing up your hands and declaring "word salad" is only appropriate when it is word salad - and that will only be established by asking such questions about it.
What didn't make sense to you? Were the words unclear? Their meaning? Ask for clarification! Be specific! Communication is hard, and takes repeated and concerted effort on both sides!
That aside, physics isn't for everybody - some of us genuinely enjoy it and have a natural aptitude.
I know that you are required to dismiss my views as "insane" and give up trying to communicate immediately by your dogmas, but ask yourself - is that the scientific thing to do? Is declaring every view that contradicts your own as "insane" and then sticking your fingers in your ears and running away the smart thing to do? Especially on a forum devoted to above average rational skepticism and investigation...
Again the question is the same. Why should you expect the object to go away from the earth when you drop it? It's a nonsensical question.
It falls towards the earth to return to equilibrium/rest/lowest available energy state.
It falls because you lifted it (and with the exact same energy used to do so), because it cannot be supported by the matter beneath it, and because its weight is greater than the weight of the media it displaces.
From the intrinsic property of matter called weight, and the interplay between the weight of an object and the weight of the media it displaces.
No. In fact, in classical physics there is no mechanism for pulling at all. Everything is push. A common example is sucking up liquid in a straw - you think you are pulling the liquid up to your mouth - but actually it is the air (and its weight!) which is pushing the liquid up.
Yes. From the weight within, surrounding, and above the object
Why should they? The general reason is because they have no imbalance in that axis/dimension to resolve. The force from the displaced media's weight is roughly equivalent on all sides, and the weight of the object seeks equilibrium (down, where - generally speaking - it came from).
Well, technically it isn't. But it is mostly the same direction because that is the direction of least resistance to reach equilibrium. All things tend towards rest.
Things fall because they are lifted (and with the energy used to lift them), and because the media which they sit upon cannot support their weight.
That is not a sensical answer to my question. If there is no force being imparted on them (other than the intrinsic force of weight and the interplay of that weight and the weight of the media displaced), why should they go east or west?
Gravitation. And, no - gravitation can't account for anything if it isn't real. I appreciate that in imagination it appears to account for it, but in reality it doesn't and the phenomenon of falling is still caused by weight. Even if gravitation were real, not all things fall, and archimedes had figured out and formally described why millennia ago (almost 2 millennia before the fiction of gravitation was first invoked by newton purely to solve an astronomical math problem).
The cause is made clear in the equation. Weight is all there is, and all that is needed.
When you don't understand, the best thing to begin with is to ask questions! The more specific the question the more likely you are to get a specific answer you're seeking.
Throwing up your hands and declaring "word salad" is only appropriate when it is word salad - and that will only be established by asking such questions about it.
What didn't make sense to you? Were the words unclear? Their meaning? Ask for clarification! Be specific! Communication is hard, and takes repeated and concerted effort on both sides!
That aside, physics isn't for everybody - some of us genuinely enjoy it and have a natural aptitude.
I know that you are required to dismiss my views as "insane" and give up trying to communicate immediately by your dogmas, but ask yourself - is that the scientific thing to do? Is declaring every view that contradicts your own as "insane" and then sticking your fingers in your ears and running away the smart thing to do? Especially on a forum devoted to above average rational skepticism and investigation...
Just food for thought. I also wish you well.
I think that's the inherent question. Why is it towards the earth, and not outward?
Again the question is the same. Why should you expect the object to go away from the earth when you drop it? It's a nonsensical question.
It falls towards the earth to return to equilibrium/rest/lowest available energy state.
It falls because you lifted it (and with the exact same energy used to do so), because it cannot be supported by the matter beneath it, and because its weight is greater than the weight of the media it displaces.