Curiously when did it get criminalised in America? I should look it up. A few decades in any majority? 2007 according to the Wiki. 15 years.
How many states is it criminalised? All? State Wide.
I am not going to justify the stance of this topic. It's grey. Do I agree with it. Debatable. Some dogs breeds haven't got any other purpose.
It isn't criminalised in much of South/Central America, has Mexico for example criminalised it? Cock/Bull/Scorpion and presumably dog isn't
Give them an inch they take a mile. Until it's ban meat. Ban furs. Ban hunting. Censor free speech. Etc. Etc. Sick of it today. With animals is it cruelty? They'd fight to death in the wild. Should it be public. Not to the extents of a hound race, the same. No difference. One isn't a blood sport. Dog bred to run is the same nature as a dog bred to fight. So sick of that attitude of policing people to the extent their freedoms are curtailed. Did it harm anybody else. No, dangerous dogs that have no other function, sure some can be pets, until it bites another pet, didn't endanger the public, they fought. There was no harm except a hypocritical attitude. It simply wants to police your freedoms with its own toxicity, and its bullshit. It hasn't solved anything else.
Our nature is the enslavement of something, potentially not me with mine, beating something over the head, forcing it to do what you want, according to your hypocritical notions of what you think it should do, to the point of unquestionable obedience? Welcome to dystopia.
How about feeding that pet kibble? It has killed it in about 15 years lower than its potential lifespan. Pet food is their main killer. Dogs the longest lived, 30-35, share one thing in common, they didn't eat kibble or any other pet food, except a natural diet, their owners prepared.
We have a responsibility to let nature be nature, preserve nature. Not cull something because wahaa it offends us.
Now you want to kill dogs because they're animals? Where does that stop? If cows cause climate change, surely the African Savannah has to go. But at the same time you want to ban hunting? Peak retard.
Look there's the moon, no animals, how about you go and colonise it. You will never stop our nature. It is conflict. Our season. Our wildlife. Our planet. Ourselves.
Curiously when did it get criminalised in America? I should look it up. A few decades in any majority? 2007 according to the Wiki. 15 years.
How many states is it criminalised? All? State Wide.
I am not going to justify the stance of this topic. It's grey. Do I agree with it. Debatable. Some dogs breeds haven't got any other purpose.
It isn't criminalised in much of South/Central America, has Mexico for example criminalised it? Cock/Bull/Scorpion and presumably dog isn't
Let me understand your oxymoron.
Our nature is the enslavement of something, potentially not me with mine, beating something over the head, forcing it to do what you want, according to your hypocritical notions of what you think it should do, to the point of unquestionable obedience? Welcome to dystopia.
How about feeding that pet kibble? It has killed it in about 15 years lower than its potential lifespan. Pet food is their main killer. Dogs the longest lived, 30-35, share one thing in common, they didn't eat kibble or any other pet food, except a natural diet, their owners prepared.
We have a responsibility to let nature be nature, preserve nature. Not cull something because wahaa it offends us.
Now you want to kill dogs because they're animals? Where does that stop? If cows cause climate change, surely the African Savannah has to go. But at the same time you want to ban hunting? Peak retard.
Look there's the moon, no animals, how about you go and colonise it. You will never stop our nature. It is conflict. Our season. Our wildlife. Our planet. Ourselves.
Deleting my former reply, I don't talk about me.