Short intro: This is just an idea to combine our knowledge to figure out what is going on. REALLY.
Template: My theory is that Big Pharma is created to put poison in people. They are promoting drugs that kill you slowly, while the media protects their image. The covid 19 scheme is created to push vaccines, and they prepared for that with all other hoaxes: mad cow, bird flu, ebola, etc. The current vaccines contain dangerous particles that aim to kill us.
The idea here is to put forth your research conclusion.
Here are the rules:
-
Everything you say must be backed up by actual researched information. That doesn't mean that you have to always display your sources. But if you are asked to show your sources, you must provide a quote that defends your statement and provide the source of it.
-
You can debate anyone on anything. You can challenge their statement with yours, considering you adhere to the first rule. Meaning, you can question anyone about anything, but you must also provide your quote and source, if asked about them.
-
Answers to any debate between two people CAN be provided by a third person, if they understand that the 1st and 2nd rule also applies to them and their statement.
-
If the communication chain breaks at some point, because someone doesn't reply. The one that put forth a challenge last is considered the winner of the debate. This can still be overruled by point 3, if anyone can answer the challenge.
Now, based on that information, here's what my template would look like in my head before I send it.
Template (my thoughts): My theory is that Big Pharma is created to put poison in people [History of big pharma. Etymology.]. They are promoting drugs that kill you slowly, while the media protects their image [Examples include the HIV drugs, cancer drugs, mercury drugs, etc.]. The covid 19 scheme is created to push vaccines, and they prepared for that with all other hoaxes: mad cow, bird flu, ebola, etc. [Examples of media news that only pushed for more vaccines]. The current vaccines contain dangerous particles that aim to kill us [Examples of Bell's Palsy, neurological damages, blood cloths, etc.].
These are my thoughts on the researched information that I have when writing these. If I put it in [], then I have the sources to prove my point. To prove it, anyone can ask me about anything in my statement, and it is my job to provide the sources.
This is not needed when typing your reply. It's only a template of my thoughts when writing these. Basically, why my sources prove the point that I am trying to make.
I welcome you to input any ideas on this or to share more information on the topic of Big Pharma, or create your own Discussion Chain, so we can finally figure out what is going on with everything.
I would like to have discussions that lead to some ending. Let's put our heads together and figure this thing out!
The end game of this is to have a conclusion on many topics that bother us. I see a lot of posts and I can group them in the theoretical sections like - finance, hollywood, religion, media, politics, occultism, history, etc. We can all share our thoughts, so we can find the final answer. But that only matters if we really dig deep into the topics and not dismiss the original post.
The way I see it. Whoever gives or asks for information will be rewarded. Whoever denies information and avoids it - should be proved wrong.
Let's put our heads together and figure out where this NWO path ends!
A good start for studying the graphene theory would be with antenna design. Those graphene devices will essentially be mostly antennas and that antenna will need to change shape to handle different frequencies so they will need to have it get pulsed and then likely reach a threshold power as well as frequency to get the change occuring. I imagine they are trying to replicate molecules with graphene.
So that way you can shape the graphene and move it into particular formations with other chemical bonded to provide the desired effect on the cells or transmitters.