Short intro: This is just an idea to combine our knowledge to figure out what is going on. REALLY.
Template: My theory is that Big Pharma is created to put poison in people. They are promoting drugs that kill you slowly, while the media protects their image. The covid 19 scheme is created to push vaccines, and they prepared for that with all other hoaxes: mad cow, bird flu, ebola, etc. The current vaccines contain dangerous particles that aim to kill us.
The idea here is to put forth your research conclusion.
Here are the rules:
-
Everything you say must be backed up by actual researched information. That doesn't mean that you have to always display your sources. But if you are asked to show your sources, you must provide a quote that defends your statement and provide the source of it.
-
You can debate anyone on anything. You can challenge their statement with yours, considering you adhere to the first rule. Meaning, you can question anyone about anything, but you must also provide your quote and source, if asked about them.
-
Answers to any debate between two people CAN be provided by a third person, if they understand that the 1st and 2nd rule also applies to them and their statement.
-
If the communication chain breaks at some point, because someone doesn't reply. The one that put forth a challenge last is considered the winner of the debate. This can still be overruled by point 3, if anyone can answer the challenge.
Now, based on that information, here's what my template would look like in my head before I send it.
Template (my thoughts): My theory is that Big Pharma is created to put poison in people [History of big pharma. Etymology.]. They are promoting drugs that kill you slowly, while the media protects their image [Examples include the HIV drugs, cancer drugs, mercury drugs, etc.]. The covid 19 scheme is created to push vaccines, and they prepared for that with all other hoaxes: mad cow, bird flu, ebola, etc. [Examples of media news that only pushed for more vaccines]. The current vaccines contain dangerous particles that aim to kill us [Examples of Bell's Palsy, neurological damages, blood cloths, etc.].
These are my thoughts on the researched information that I have when writing these. If I put it in [], then I have the sources to prove my point. To prove it, anyone can ask me about anything in my statement, and it is my job to provide the sources.
This is not needed when typing your reply. It's only a template of my thoughts when writing these. Basically, why my sources prove the point that I am trying to make.
I welcome you to input any ideas on this or to share more information on the topic of Big Pharma, or create your own Discussion Chain, so we can finally figure out what is going on with everything.
I would like to have discussions that lead to some ending. Let's put our heads together and figure this thing out!
The end game of this is to have a conclusion on many topics that bother us. I see a lot of posts and I can group them in the theoretical sections like - finance, hollywood, religion, media, politics, occultism, history, etc. We can all share our thoughts, so we can find the final answer. But that only matters if we really dig deep into the topics and not dismiss the original post.
The way I see it. Whoever gives or asks for information will be rewarded. Whoever denies information and avoids it - should be proved wrong.
Let's put our heads together and figure out where this NWO path ends!
I think big pharma is most likely a way to monetize military research and push the narrative that they are funding a helpful service when most of it is designed to figure out how to play god and create and destroy life.
They are looking for control, so the exploration into how to manipulate the body is natural progression, however, they have weaponized it due to the nature of it being in the system of their control. They also use it likely to cover up the same such war. They can cure issues that they can selectively release into the public.
This way the cure is 'real' enough in the sense that it is removed from the cause which was likely the result of some other experiments. For example they likely looked into DDT as a war measure and then they cause issues, so they look into other ways of correcting for those new issues without taking away the money source. It's like they are performing the biggest shell game of all time. Everytime you look at a problem they have already moved to a different shell and they are in fact wanting you to lift the old ones because it will delay you from figuring the latest.
I think that this community in conspiracy theories is partly the issue as well. We normally are reactionary and play into this effect quite handsomely. We support their past efforts whilst they can divert to their new ones.
That is why grifters are the worst and why 9/11 truthers will never make a difference....
Tbh, big pharma is not the current objective. They already won it. They want people talking about it because they are moving along.
The next thing is not pharma....I can tell you that much.
I think if I were a betting man....I think next big thing is city builders.
They want to each be king of the next super mega project city of the future.
Lots of billionaires are buy land and setting up private establishments.
Feudalism is back, and neocorporate mask is the only difference this time. They will be setting up new cities and destroying the existing ones from the past
Ok, I will try to answer in your terminology.
Petrol drugs were popularized in the US by John D. Rockefeller.
Opium drugs were popularized in the US during Woodstock.
Why do you think the US soldiers go to kill in Central Asia: in Afghanistan (opium) and Iraq (petrol)?
Why do you think the biggest news now is Covid? Not the tiny war in Ukraine?
Why did so much billionaires, that have no medical training, invested in medical research?? Bill Gates has no medical degree and is the face of ModeRNA...
Are you not worried about long-term damages from a vaccine that is created ONE year after a supposed epidemic?
I welcome your input, but I don't agree with your focus. In my opinion, you seem to downplay the epidemic that started it all. That's very strange for someone, who was alive during 2020... Did you forget that they literally wanted to kill those without masks??
Sorry if I am pushy, but this topic was overplayed for 3 years already... The vaccines are the dumbest thing that has ever happened to humanity... I cannot compare it to anything else. Even vaccinated people wake up to this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT3IqZjT_9A - Here's a video of the inventor of the PCR test. He states that the PCR test can show almost everything.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EZswhBD8Ix0M/ - Here's a kiwi testing positive for covid based on PCR test...
Dude the entire thing was a distraction designed to spread fear and gain control all the while tanking the market and allow for massive wealth gain in the hands of the elite. The pandemic is just a step...nothing more than most other plans. Essentially 9/11 for the modern world..... they primed for 5 years or so ..then push the program and then reap the benefits(last 2 years) and now....they are moving along...but why would they stop the charade? That would be stupid. They commit for 10 years for most of these scams so they probably will push the narrative until 2030 for pandemics etc because it's the new rainbow that sells each pumkinspice season....
They want to own the world ... but they want to build with it. They want a paradise for themselves.
I have no doubt about any of your statements. That's quite well put if you look at the surface of the situation. That's what it seems that they are doing, and they are really doing that. But is that the true aim? Covid is just a distraction?
I would like to dig deeper, if you don't mind. I totally agree with you, but I don't think the filthy rich care about money anymore. They've got all the money already...
Actually Jose Delgado experimented with chips on bulls to control them in the 60s. What is more interesting is that it was televised in the 80s. The distraction is the swedish chip, or neuralink. The future is graphene - nanotechnology. It's self-assembling nanotech that is confirmed in the mRNA shots - https://conspiracies.win/p/17r9WTDroS/they-admit-they-use-graphene-qua/c/
Graphene is one-layer thick, for reference. It's not a rice chip, not a brain medusa... just atoms. And they can assemble with the right frequency - roll 5G.
I don't disagree with you - you are correct and I hope I state it enough. I just look deeper into the problem. Even 9/11 wasn't planned as long as vaccines to control the population. I don't agree that's just distraction. Adding 5G towers to make EM frequency faster when graphene is a superconductor... No, I think the story goes deeper.
Anyway, thanks for the input. I'd like to continue going deeper, but I can understand if you don't. Could just all be a distraction, I guess we could know if we look deeper into this...
A good start for studying the graphene theory would be with antenna design. Those graphene devices will essentially be mostly antennas and that antenna will need to change shape to handle different frequencies so they will need to have it get pulsed and then likely reach a threshold power as well as frequency to get the change occuring. I imagine they are trying to replicate molecules with graphene.
So that way you can shape the graphene and move it into particular formations with other chemical bonded to provide the desired effect on the cells or transmitters.