the survival of normies depend on not going against the group, they are intellectual, spiritual and cognitive weaklings
True. But having through about your female comment I realized it is the exact opposite. The survival of male normies especially are dependent upon going along with the group as they are weaklings
I wouldn't say it's a female trait. The only people I saw protesting the lockdowns as they came out were Christian girls. The only anti-maskers I saw were women, who were then attacked by men and no one did anything to stop it.
The only groups I saw against this had men in it because the women were passionate about the issue so their partners got dragged into it.
If anything, conformity and group think are masculine. Look at all the fascist govts/groups. Look at the army. Women in a group like an army wouldn't take being yelled at and ordered to do bullshit stuff that destroys them. They would have an innate sense of self survival and subvert the organization. Males just do things and don't care if they live or die. Like 'oh it will be cool if I jump off a cliff or do a back flip while drunk. My fellow males will give me respect'.
Plus, women actually care about their children and protect them. Women in their feminine power have an innate intuition about possible threat. Female intuition is something that comes from within /from spirit/ nature, not a man made group think.
That's why all of the mothers protecting children against vaccines, mothers for vaccine awareness, and mama bears saying it's ok to wait (to wait for proof of safety) exist. I don't see any men's groups telling men it's ok to wait for real evidence before getting their kids vaxxed. I don't see any papa bears.
Women are much more competitive then men. Women not only compete against the opposite sex as men do, they must also always compete amongst each other. That's why you have mindless males mass defending Tate just because he is a guy. Guys will always defend their group of guys no matter whether right or wrong, true false, moral or immoral. That's why women are always warned against marrying a cop because all of his cop brothers will cover up his abuse and she will get no protection of justice.
Women are always backstabbing each other for their own self benefit. That is not group think that is an innate drive for self preservation and the preservation of their children. Men don't have that. They are fine as long as the group goes on. That's why they are happy to go to war and join armies.
Group think is a male thing.
Self preservation, self reliance, obeying inner guidance is female.
also a female trait, that's why the elites feminize the masses
I would say that when the elite feminized males, they gave them all the toxic traits of women without any of the strengths. Because men can't really have female strengths.
I have wondered for years about testosterone. Why is it that hormones are such an important part of personality and behavior?
Why is it that lowering testosterone in males, as they have, has so weakened them? When women still have significantly less testosterone than even the weakest male. How do some of the women have the strength and courage and drive that most men don't have? I honestly don't know. But even though testosterone really is important and creates huge change.... Women are somehow able to do great feats without it. Look at all the women speaking up against trans in women's sports.
How do some of the women have the strength and courage and drive that most men don't have
Because drive is a social game. A male has drive when he knows he can win something. So, most males chase excellence to get a social reward (access to better females, basically, if you darwinian reduce the motivation).
But since it's harder and harder to achieve excellence and secure reproduction, males are not motivated anymore.
Women, on the other hand, are neurotically motivated, because they need to select the weak males out, but most males are weak. So they have this drive that appears as big outside, but it's actually a perpetual desperation of their natural selection bias.
True. But having through about your female comment I realized it is the exact opposite. The survival of male normies especially are dependent upon going along with the group as they are weaklings
I wouldn't say it's a female trait. The only people I saw protesting the lockdowns as they came out were Christian girls. The only anti-maskers I saw were women, who were then attacked by men and no one did anything to stop it.
The only groups I saw against this had men in it because the women were passionate about the issue so their partners got dragged into it.
If anything, conformity and group think are masculine. Look at all the fascist govts/groups. Look at the army. Women in a group like an army wouldn't take being yelled at and ordered to do bullshit stuff that destroys them. They would have an innate sense of self survival and subvert the organization. Males just do things and don't care if they live or die. Like 'oh it will be cool if I jump off a cliff or do a back flip while drunk. My fellow males will give me respect'.
Plus, women actually care about their children and protect them. Women in their feminine power have an innate intuition about possible threat. Female intuition is something that comes from within /from spirit/ nature, not a man made group think.
That's why all of the mothers protecting children against vaccines, mothers for vaccine awareness, and mama bears saying it's ok to wait (to wait for proof of safety) exist. I don't see any men's groups telling men it's ok to wait for real evidence before getting their kids vaxxed. I don't see any papa bears.
Women are much more competitive then men. Women not only compete against the opposite sex as men do, they must also always compete amongst each other. That's why you have mindless males mass defending Tate just because he is a guy. Guys will always defend their group of guys no matter whether right or wrong, true false, moral or immoral. That's why women are always warned against marrying a cop because all of his cop brothers will cover up his abuse and she will get no protection of justice.
Women are always backstabbing each other for their own self benefit. That is not group think that is an innate drive for self preservation and the preservation of their children. Men don't have that. They are fine as long as the group goes on. That's why they are happy to go to war and join armies.
Group think is a male thing.
Self preservation, self reliance, obeying inner guidance is female.
I would say that when the elite feminized males, they gave them all the toxic traits of women without any of the strengths. Because men can't really have female strengths.
I have wondered for years about testosterone. Why is it that hormones are such an important part of personality and behavior?
Why is it that lowering testosterone in males, as they have, has so weakened them? When women still have significantly less testosterone than even the weakest male. How do some of the women have the strength and courage and drive that most men don't have? I honestly don't know. But even though testosterone really is important and creates huge change.... Women are somehow able to do great feats without it. Look at all the women speaking up against trans in women's sports.
Because drive is a social game. A male has drive when he knows he can win something. So, most males chase excellence to get a social reward (access to better females, basically, if you darwinian reduce the motivation).
But since it's harder and harder to achieve excellence and secure reproduction, males are not motivated anymore.
Women, on the other hand, are neurotically motivated, because they need to select the weak males out, but most males are weak. So they have this drive that appears as big outside, but it's actually a perpetual desperation of their natural selection bias.