Cohennnnnnnnnnnnnnn! (<- anybody get this reference?)
What a bizarre and disturbing story. The only remotely related subject that comes to mind is Christian Zionism. It's a load of crypto-Jewish nonsense spewed by the likes from John Hagee out of the heretical Scofield Reference Bible.
It all seems beyond laughable, but the last I heard there were 70 million adherents in the US alone. Maybe, maybe not, but if you look at the wiki, they seem to quite carefully refrain from even estimating how many adherents there are to this view.
Also, as lengthy as the article is, they don't even mention the Scofield. I'd say They don't want anyone stumbling around wiki and realizing something is going on with this, let alone finding out.
One woman, a very excellent and successful southern lawyer...
A lawyer of laws as suggested by others; a success based on following suggested orders to take the place which another has left, and a position that cannot excel beyond submission.
In short: one under another one...under a chosen one.
from centrist to deepstate
a) -IST (centrist) implies ones consent to -ISM (centrism) aka ones submission to another. Ignoring this implies a deep-state of consciousness, buried underneath the suggestions by others.
b) being able to choose between perceivable (need) and suggested (want) implies being choice within balance (need/want) aka the center (perception) of ones surrounding (perceivable).
Others suggest centrism to tempt one to permit others by willing consent to represent self as the center...as the selected choice (French élite).
I don't know what Israel is doing.
a) erecting a center, while cutting off their circumference. Those who comprehend this will do anything to not be cut off too.
b) knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); don't implies suggested nihilism (information)...the latter tempts one to confirm and hold onto; while the former inspires one to adapt and let go of, while resisting temptations.
Suggested "israel" implies a position somewhere; perceivable ISRAEL (Hebrew yisra'el) - "he that striveth with God" implies ones struggle (life) within temptation (inception towards death).
changed...totally different
Partial differences (life) can only exist within total change (inception towards death). A difference can never be total; since it implies being different from something else.
I have met 2
Being implies one apart from other ones. Others suggest pluralism (met; coming together) and collectivism (2) to distract partial one from self.
conservative
Inception towards death (ongoing loss) generates life (temporary growth) not for conservation (to preserve from loss), but for consumption (to grow within loss)...others suggest conservatism to tempt one to ignore that.
Others suggested antisemitism towards your consent (want or not want)...you chose "not want", which fuels the suggested antisemitism by the chosen ones, while keeping you within a conflict of reason (want vs not want).
That conflict of reason among the gentiles represents the cut-off circumference; which in return permits the jews to erect a center among them.
i'm clearly not a chosen person
That represents suggested definism (I am) and nihilism (not) tempting others to consent (agree or disagree), hence choosing you.
it changes people and not for the better.
Inception towards death changes life...and not for the better.
Evangelical church pastors can take a free trip to Israel. https://fecministries.org/holyland2023/#:~:text=A%20Free%20Provision%20For%20FEC%27s,spiritual%20health%20and%20ministry%20enrichment.
AIPAC also sponsors trips for US Congressment and other influentials on trips to Israel. https://arabamericannews.com/2019/06/27/new-analysis-shows-aipac-has-spent-millions-to-fund-u-s-congressional-trips-to-israel/
Maybe they give them an Epstein special. Ply them with child hookers, give them drugs, give them money, all of it captured on tape.
But, yeah, everyone who visits Israel has a "come to Satan" moment.
I have ALWAYS been suspicious of Israel giving police chiefs free trips to Israel. I always wondered whether the visitors got 'altered'.
Cohennnnnnnnnnnnnnn! (<- anybody get this reference?)
What a bizarre and disturbing story. The only remotely related subject that comes to mind is Christian Zionism. It's a load of crypto-Jewish nonsense spewed by the likes from John Hagee out of the heretical Scofield Reference Bible.
It all seems beyond laughable, but the last I heard there were 70 million adherents in the US alone. Maybe, maybe not, but if you look at the wiki, they seem to quite carefully refrain from even estimating how many adherents there are to this view.
Also, as lengthy as the article is, they don't even mention the Scofield. I'd say They don't want anyone stumbling around wiki and realizing something is going on with this, let alone finding out.
A lawyer of laws as suggested by others; a success based on following suggested orders to take the place which another has left, and a position that cannot excel beyond submission.
In short: one under another one...under a chosen one.
a) -IST (centrist) implies ones consent to -ISM (centrism) aka ones submission to another. Ignoring this implies a deep-state of consciousness, buried underneath the suggestions by others.
b) being able to choose between perceivable (need) and suggested (want) implies being choice within balance (need/want) aka the center (perception) of ones surrounding (perceivable).
Others suggest centrism to tempt one to permit others by willing consent to represent self as the center...as the selected choice (French élite).
a) erecting a center, while cutting off their circumference. Those who comprehend this will do anything to not be cut off too.
b) knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); don't implies suggested nihilism (information)...the latter tempts one to confirm and hold onto; while the former inspires one to adapt and let go of, while resisting temptations.
Suggested "israel" implies a position somewhere; perceivable ISRAEL (Hebrew yisra'el) - "he that striveth with God" implies ones struggle (life) within temptation (inception towards death).
Partial differences (life) can only exist within total change (inception towards death). A difference can never be total; since it implies being different from something else.
Being implies one apart from other ones. Others suggest pluralism (met; coming together) and collectivism (2) to distract partial one from self.
Inception towards death (ongoing loss) generates life (temporary growth) not for conservation (to preserve from loss), but for consumption (to grow within loss)...others suggest conservatism to tempt one to ignore that.
Others suggested antisemitism towards your consent (want or not want)...you chose "not want", which fuels the suggested antisemitism by the chosen ones, while keeping you within a conflict of reason (want vs not want).
That conflict of reason among the gentiles represents the cut-off circumference; which in return permits the jews to erect a center among them.
That represents suggested definism (I am) and nihilism (not) tempting others to consent (agree or disagree), hence choosing you.
Inception towards death changes life...and not for the better.