Since you're here you should be familiar with trauma based mind control. Governments use it, secret societies use it, religions/cults use it. It's real and it works.
The only problem with traditional trauma-based mind control is how time intensive it is to create an alter. It can take years of abuse for a controller to split a personality, and the techniques do not work on everyone.
COVAIDS changed this. This is how it works:
- Through mass media, create dominant fear narrative. Create competing secondary narrative that downplays the fear narrative.
- Corral as many minds as possible into taking the shot but present it as a choice. Create competing secondary narrative that fully describes the dangers of the shot.
- Split the mind of those who took the shot when they experience side effects but cannot share it with their peer group. The alter is created by the mind when it compartmentalizes the damage from the shot to prevent ostracization from their peer group.
Why the secondary narratives and choices? It's a trick to make the mind feel like the abuse from the shot is self-inflicted, and it reinforces in-group out-group dynamics.
Between giving the shot to over half the world, maybe 10% with side effects, and maybe another 10% vulnerable to trauma-based mind control - that's more minds under trauma-based mind control than ever before in history.
The triggers for the mind control? Your guess is as good as mine but it's likely something provided by mass media.
The use for the mind control? Only the controllers know this.
Yes. Not sure how this is accomplished.
Suggested words into consenting mind/memory. Perceivable implies sound going through mind/memory; suggested tempts one to hold onto definitions, hence memorizing words.
PER (by) SONOS (sound) inspires (nudges) ones arranged-mind (instru-ment) to adapt.
Suggested media can only be shaped within perceivable base...those ignoring perceivable (inspiration) only get the suggested message (information).
The Mass Scale Trauma Based Mind Control was the suggested question towards many; each ones consent was the answer. Consenting implies wanting or not wanting suggested; while ignoring perceivable need.
The resulting conflict of reason (want vs not want) represents the controlled environment.
You aren't wrong, in fact you're basically _____.
There are explicit messages in what's said, but also sometimes you can hide the programming in the things that aren't ____.
So unless you live in the stone age with Barney Rubble and ____ Flintstone, you can see that they lead your mind to a certain set of words.
I'm Too Sexy for this PsyOp.