Bernard Kastrup showed quite well, how the current material paradigm of consciousness is completely untenable and based on promissary assumptions.
Anybody can read his book or watch his videos, his argument is clear, logical and with minimal assumptions, and he uses falsification to shoot down the basic pillars of materialist consciousness theory:
I've come to believe in non-local consciousness, or consciousness that originates outside our physical bodies and outside our brains. To me, this is the most scientifically sound explanation.
Believing implies ones consent to suggested collectivism. Those who consent hold onto suggested information; while those suggesting it are aggregating/collecting those who consent.
conscious
CON (with) SCIO (knowledge) aka being within (perception) knowledge (perceivable)...others utilize suggestion to distract ones awareness thereof.
our explanation
EX (life) within PLAN (inception towards death) of TION (action) implies ones singular reaction aka free will of choice...suggested collectivism/pluralism (our) tempts singular (one) to ignore this.
https://www.insider.com/studied-near-death-experiences-our-explanation-of-consciousness-is-wrong-2023-9?amp
Bernard Kastrup showed quite well, how the current material paradigm of consciousness is completely untenable and based on promissary assumptions.
Anybody can read his book or watch his videos, his argument is clear, logical and with minimal assumptions, and he uses falsification to shoot down the basic pillars of materialist consciousness theory:
https://www.bernardokastrup.com/2013/04/why-materialism-is-baloney-overview.html
Grober is a newcomer to the field, but if even an investment banker can figure it out, anybody can.
Saw it myself on salvia
Believing implies ones consent to suggested collectivism. Those who consent hold onto suggested information; while those suggesting it are aggregating/collecting those who consent.
CON (with) SCIO (knowledge) aka being within (perception) knowledge (perceivable)...others utilize suggestion to distract ones awareness thereof.
EX (life) within PLAN (inception towards death) of TION (action) implies ones singular reaction aka free will of choice...suggested collectivism/pluralism (our) tempts singular (one) to ignore this.