370
00:35:06,225 --> 00:35:09,603
Maybe there is something about this Priory of Sion.
I hope not.
Any Priory story ends in bloodshed. They were butchered by the Church.
It all started over a thousand years ago when a French king...
...conquered the holy city of Jerusalem.
This crusade, one of the most massive and sweeping in history...
...was actually orchestrated by a secret brotherhood...
...the Priory of Sion...
...and their military arm, the Knights Templar.
But the Templars were created to protect the Holy Land.
That was a cover to hide their true goal, according to this myth.
Supposedly the invasion was to find an artefact...
...lost since the time of Christ.
An artefact, it was said, the Church would kill to possess.
Did they find it, this buried treasure?
Put it this way:
One day the Templars simply stopped searching.
They quit the Holy Land and travelled directly to Rome.
Whether they blackmailed the papacy...
...or the Church bought their silence, no one knows.
But it is a fact the papacy declared these Priory knights...
...these Knights Templar, of limitless power.
By the 1300s, the Templars had grown too powerful.
Too threatening.
So the Vatican issued secret orders...
...to be opened simultaneously all across Europe.
The Pope had declared the Knights Templar Satan worshipers...
...and said God had charged him with cleansing the earth of these heretics.
The plan went off like clockwork.
The Templars were all but exterminated.
The date was October 13th, 1307. A Friday.
Friday the 13th.
The Pope sent troops to claim the Priory's treasure...
...but they found nothing.
The few surviving Knights of the Priory had vanished...
...and the search for their sacred artefact began again.
What artefact? I've never heard about any of this.
Yes, you have.
Almost everyone on earth has.
You just know it as the Holy Grail.
No.
In fact there's evidence to suggest, the Greeks who are responsible for the New Testament. The Vatican version. Put in all that miracle, superpower stuff, because they'd been doing it for centuries with their pantheon. In fact in other version's of the time period, none. Or possibly even a resurrection. Hence Thomas's omission. Quite possibly Magdalene's. And suggestively he was also married.
In the Koran he doesn't resurrect either.
Resurrection provides the basis of an afterlife, his divinity. Without it you technically don't have Jesus the son of God. Instead he's another prophet, or priest. What I mean by resurrection, isn't the metaphysical, but actually taken from our physical dimension. When in fact it was a metaphor in the other version of the period. Like the Egyptian it was taken from. On death the soul transcends to its judgement. Heaven, hell, or inbetween. The new testament Christ redeems, forgives, saves humanity if it accepts salvation. In the other version it had its own disciples, different. Less apostles other gospels. But Christ didn't offer the wicked redemption. No resurrection.
Apparently Christianity like Islam's Koran civil warred over the version published for longer.
Like a tapestry there's a much bigger pattern of where and how it formed. It takes a lot of study into what it replaced.