Rumors Are Flying That Fetterman Has Been Replaced With a Double – but They’re Missing the Biggest Oddity
Ever since video spread far and wide last week of Sen. John Fetterman (D-Uncle Fester) reacting with sarcastic derision to news that House Republicans were considering beginning a formal impeachment i...
"Back in June, in a fairly typical utterance, Fetterman spoke in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee about the collapse of a section of I-95 in Pennsylvania: “Uh, no, I, I, I, uh, would, would, would just, ah, um, really like ta, y’know, the 95, 95, 95. Y’know. Um, y’know, obviously, that, y’know, you’re pretty much preoccupied with, with the 95, and I certainly am too, and you know it’s a major, uh, atery [sic], na-, not just for, for Pennsylvania, but for the east, the east coast. And, Penn- a lot of Pennsylvanians are worried that the delays and repairs bring to its standstill deal.”
Not only that. Back in February, the New York Times revealed that Fetterman had difficulty understanding what people say and likened his condition to “trying to make out the muffled voice of the teacher in the ‘Peanuts’ cartoon, whose words could never be deciphered.” He had this condition for a long while: since he couldn’t understand spoken questions during his debate with Dr. Mehmet Oz in 2022, he was given the questions on a closed-caption system. Dasha Burns of NBC News stated afterward that when the closed-captioning was off, “it wasn’t clear he was understanding our conversation.”
Last Tuesday, however, when a reporter asked Fetterman about the Biden impeachment, he understood every word and responded immediately with a sarcastic display of anxiety. And that’s the real story here: when did Fetterman become able to understand spoken speech again? When did he become able to formulate coherent responses? To be sure, he said little about the impeachment beyond “It’s devastating” and “Don’t do it,” but even in that, he sounded more in command of his faculties than he ever did during the 2022 campaign or in the Senate at the beginning of the year."
One can imagine that these neurological deficits must be difficult to replicate, and very taxing on the person trying to do so. Might as well just punt and forget it ever existed.
We saw something similar with the super-fake-ass 2011 Tucson shooting, where Congressunit Gabby Giffords supposedly took one to the head and suffered severe brain damage. At the time, the constantly reinforced "proof" of her injury was that she had very obvious "aphasia".
Years ago, a close friend of my mother's had a stroke during surgery and also ended up suffering from aphasia. She would stammer and search around for even familiar words. Once you knew what you were looking at, it was quite distinct.
Since such a neurological condition would be hard to replicate, they just had Giffords talk like a baby. Anyone of us can do that for as long as we care to. It's quite laughable compared to real aphasia.
And in the rewrite of history that we all must now expect, if you look at the wiki writeup on Gifford's recovery, they don't even use the word "aphasia". Too easy for someone to click on the link and see that's clearly not what she exhibits.
If it was me running the show, I'd just drop the whole pretense and go with the story that both Giffords and Fetterman were miraculously cured by sacrifice to their Lord and Master, Satan.
Stroke victims often do hours of speech therapy per week.
Do you ever see that show or read the comic “invincible,”every time someone is cloned the copies get dumber and dumber… i think this was a concept in the movie “multiplicity,” too. 🤔