Not from Planes. Angles. Planes fly over and are observable. What orbital platform? It would be visible. It would be huge. The multiple hits needed, the power source. You're talking charge times. Multiple lasers. It needs cooling. The laser gets damaged the more it fires. The laser blooms, and there's refraction, the beam to impact gets weaker over distances. It is carrying energy not light. Plus it's in upper orbit. There are angles, speed of the fly over, keeping it in orbit. Or it's full of fuel thrusters mechanics keeping it in position to fire multiple times. Where is the constant resupply and maintenance. Lifetime of a satellite what is it? A decade to 15 years? Orbital platform. Now it needs constant resupplying.
Where is the hole. Particularly from a laser. It heats an object piercing it. Leaving on metal a burned hole, where it heats the object. Every laser does this. Rocks trees metal. The impact mark. A fire inspector knows this. Where the fire accelerated from the source of the heat. It ignited from there it was hottest. Lasers leave a heat spot, where it get hotter and hotter, causing a hole or burn. Look at lasers downing missiles, and shells. They have a hole through them. Drones tend to burst into flames leaving a sorch mark. Where the laser slices through making an impact hole.
Why isn't Russia using the same tech in Ukraine?
As a fire inspector are there any compounds, chemicals that can acceralerate the fire on houses and vehicles. White ash is common in complete fire degradation. No carbon left just ash extreme heat. It's completely burnt.
Instead what we have is guesswork, and it's those aliens again.
He suggested microwave weapon as opposed to laser. Atmosphere where lasers struggle. They struggle in weather. Clouds dust. Enough to cause the beam to reflect. Microwave is even worse the further away. It becomes less believable. Guesswork outside of an anomaly. But we've seen the same thing in California. Not quite to the same extent of those cars.
No you're believing in fiction because an anomaly occurred.
Look at what you linked. Dumb ass. Crowd control. Microwave. That distance is what? Crowd control. Like what range? It isn't on a satellite orbital platform.
Really. I'm ignorant. I am the only person offering debate. You're a space monkey. Look what you linked. It has a title a description and range. On a truck.
There you are telling me you swear it's a space monkey.
Believe in the space monkey.
I link pictures, of wildfire, not on Maui where the same thing occurred. You're telling me I am ignorant. No you're blind and stupid and ignorant.
I can link pictures of Russia, Australia, Amazon, etc etc.
The same, trees are more resistance than today's crap. These guys Glenfield Tower. There are plants that are almost entirely fire proof. But a modern building is full of accelerants burning to Ash.
Worse it could've been accelerated. But it weren't no space monkeys.
The entire time. This is what grinds me is you're hostile to any other suggestions. It was a space monkey or else. It's Flat Earth or else. They're cannibals eating pineal glands or else. Or else you start telling me look. Look what you tell me.
How do you get through your day? Blind leading the dumb causing the insane. No different to all those things you're against. Your programming is simpler and even more stupid. It hates. Easy.
Not from Planes. Angles. Planes fly over and are observable. What orbital platform? It would be visible. It would be huge. The multiple hits needed, the power source. You're talking charge times. Multiple lasers. It needs cooling. The laser gets damaged the more it fires. The laser blooms, and there's refraction, the beam to impact gets weaker over distances. It is carrying energy not light. Plus it's in upper orbit. There are angles, speed of the fly over, keeping it in orbit. Or it's full of fuel thrusters mechanics keeping it in position to fire multiple times. Where is the constant resupply and maintenance. Lifetime of a satellite what is it? A decade to 15 years? Orbital platform. Now it needs constant resupplying.
Where is the hole. Particularly from a laser. It heats an object piercing it. Leaving on metal a burned hole, where it heats the object. Every laser does this. Rocks trees metal. The impact mark. A fire inspector knows this. Where the fire accelerated from the source of the heat. It ignited from there it was hottest. Lasers leave a heat spot, where it get hotter and hotter, causing a hole or burn. Look at lasers downing missiles, and shells. They have a hole through them. Drones tend to burst into flames leaving a sorch mark. Where the laser slices through making an impact hole.
Why isn't Russia using the same tech in Ukraine?
As a fire inspector are there any compounds, chemicals that can acceralerate the fire on houses and vehicles. White ash is common in complete fire degradation. No carbon left just ash extreme heat. It's completely burnt.
Instead what we have is guesswork, and it's those aliens again.
He suggested microwave weapon as opposed to laser. Atmosphere where lasers struggle. They struggle in weather. Clouds dust. Enough to cause the beam to reflect. Microwave is even worse the further away. It becomes less believable. Guesswork outside of an anomaly. But we've seen the same thing in California. Not quite to the same extent of those cars.
It's not lasers, it's microwaves. The arborist says that clearly. I can tell you're just naysaying to naysay, which is fine I suppose.
Think of it as a bigger version of this: https://terasense.com/news/active-denial-system-a-terahertz-based-military-deterrent-for-safe-crowd-control/
No you're believing in fiction because an anomaly occurred.
Look at what you linked. Dumb ass. Crowd control. Microwave. That distance is what? Crowd control. Like what range? It isn't on a satellite orbital platform.
You're so ignorant, it pains me to think how you make your way through life. It's the same principles of physics, that's the point.
Really. I'm ignorant. I am the only person offering debate. You're a space monkey. Look what you linked. It has a title a description and range. On a truck.
There you are telling me you swear it's a space monkey.
Believe in the space monkey.
I link pictures, of wildfire, not on Maui where the same thing occurred. You're telling me I am ignorant. No you're blind and stupid and ignorant.
I can link pictures of Russia, Australia, Amazon, etc etc.
The same, trees are more resistance than today's crap. These guys Glenfield Tower. There are plants that are almost entirely fire proof. But a modern building is full of accelerants burning to Ash.
Worse it could've been accelerated. But it weren't no space monkeys.
The entire time. This is what grinds me is you're hostile to any other suggestions. It was a space monkey or else. It's Flat Earth or else. They're cannibals eating pineal glands or else. Or else you start telling me look. Look what you tell me.
How do you get through your day? Blind leading the dumb causing the insane. No different to all those things you're against. Your programming is simpler and even more stupid. It hates. Easy.