Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

13
Forensic Arborist gives his opinion about the Maui Fire (rumble.com)
posted 2 years ago by Merkava_4 2 years ago by Merkava_4 +14 / -1
25 comments share
25 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
▲ -4 ▼
– Ep0ch -4 points 2 years ago +1 / -5

Not from Planes. Angles. Planes fly over and are observable. What orbital platform? It would be visible. It would be huge. The multiple hits needed, the power source. You're talking charge times. Multiple lasers. It needs cooling. The laser gets damaged the more it fires. The laser blooms, and there's refraction, the beam to impact gets weaker over distances. It is carrying energy not light. Plus it's in upper orbit. There are angles, speed of the fly over, keeping it in orbit. Or it's full of fuel thrusters mechanics keeping it in position to fire multiple times. Where is the constant resupply and maintenance. Lifetime of a satellite what is it? A decade to 15 years? Orbital platform. Now it needs constant resupplying.

Where is the hole. Particularly from a laser. It heats an object piercing it. Leaving on metal a burned hole, where it heats the object. Every laser does this. Rocks trees metal. The impact mark. A fire inspector knows this. Where the fire accelerated from the source of the heat. It ignited from there it was hottest. Lasers leave a heat spot, where it get hotter and hotter, causing a hole or burn. Look at lasers downing missiles, and shells. They have a hole through them. Drones tend to burst into flames leaving a sorch mark. Where the laser slices through making an impact hole.

Why isn't Russia using the same tech in Ukraine?

As a fire inspector are there any compounds, chemicals that can acceralerate the fire on houses and vehicles. White ash is common in complete fire degradation. No carbon left just ash extreme heat. It's completely burnt.

Instead what we have is guesswork, and it's those aliens again.

He suggested microwave weapon as opposed to laser. Atmosphere where lasers struggle. They struggle in weather. Clouds dust. Enough to cause the beam to reflect. Microwave is even worse the further away. It becomes less believable. Guesswork outside of an anomaly. But we've seen the same thing in California. Not quite to the same extent of those cars.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

It's not lasers, it's microwaves. The arborist says that clearly. I can tell you're just naysaying to naysay, which is fine I suppose.

Think of it as a bigger version of this: https://terasense.com/news/active-denial-system-a-terahertz-based-military-deterrent-for-safe-crowd-control/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– Ep0ch -4 points 2 years ago +1 / -5

Pictures.

https://news.sky.com/story/california-wildfires-the-eerie-aftermath-of-devastating-fire-tornadoes-11453851

https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_nbcnews-fp-1200-630,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2017_43/2199136/172023-california-wildfires-aftermath-santa-rosa-se-149p.jpg

https://www.canadiancontractor.ca/canadian-contractor/updated-fort-mcmurray-construction-association-still-frustrated-ministry-silence/1003277085/attachment/13221470_877079962438338_3395570939608416852_n/

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/g25055513/california-wildfires-photos/

How about we get a pro in. Instead of I dunno what this topic link is. Look the same. Look.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

You were talking about lasers, nobody is talking about lasers.

I'm saying, if you're going to debate someone, at least get their argument correct!

I'm not going to debate whether it was a natural fire or not, because I personally think it was.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -5 ▼
– Ep0ch -5 points 2 years ago +1 / -6

No you're believing in fiction because an anomaly occurred.

Look at what you linked. Dumb ass. Crowd control. Microwave. That distance is what? Crowd control. Like what range? It isn't on a satellite orbital platform.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

You're so ignorant, it pains me to think how you make your way through life. It's the same principles of physics, that's the point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– Ep0ch -4 points 2 years ago +1 / -5

Really. I'm ignorant. I am the only person offering debate. You're a space monkey. Look what you linked. It has a title a description and range. On a truck.

There you are telling me you swear it's a space monkey.

Believe in the space monkey.

I link pictures, of wildfire, not on Maui where the same thing occurred. You're telling me I am ignorant. No you're blind and stupid and ignorant.

I can link pictures of Russia, Australia, Amazon, etc etc.

The same, trees are more resistance than today's crap. These guys Glenfield Tower. There are plants that are almost entirely fire proof. But a modern building is full of accelerants burning to Ash.

Worse it could've been accelerated. But it weren't no space monkeys.

The entire time. This is what grinds me is you're hostile to any other suggestions. It was a space monkey or else. It's Flat Earth or else. They're cannibals eating pineal glands or else. Or else you start telling me look. Look what you tell me.

How do you get through your day? Blind leading the dumb causing the insane. No different to all those things you're against. Your programming is simpler and even more stupid. It hates. Easy.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 3 ▼
– muhqtardtho 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

You double replied. That's an L. Hold it nerd. Or should I say nerds?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– Ep0ch -3 points 2 years ago +1 / -4

No. I offered several points of discussion in separate posts of conversation.

Because I doubt the veracity of this topic. He hasn't done his homework. Especially when it gets into the space monkeys, as an explanation for it.

He said in all his fire experience. Yet we look at it. It's happening globally. Everywhere.

The only time tree's get burnt to stumps is largely, if they're napalmed. Or if the fire carries on burning.

Otherwise fire is its own beast. It seems our modern buildings fair no better. In fact they're the first things burnt, like all that other kindling. We look at the cars, Canada, California, possibly Australia, and Russia it's the same.

I haven't checked Greece and Spain. But I am gonna make a guess the cars melted.

The reason for it. Is the increasing use of alloy metals in modern cars. It isn't the solid chassis. Rather all the alloy metal. It melts with all the accelerants, upholstery, rubber, plastics, fuel, until the glass shatters and melts. The same in our houses today. Full of combustibles.

Hell I am no fire detective, but I don't believe in Space Monkeys. Not yet. That tech isn't there. Not on that scale. Not from Space.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy